International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health

Ponny MS et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Jun;8(6):2969-2976

http://www.ijcmph.com

pISSN2394-6032 | eISSN 2394-6040

A study of prevalence of anemia and associated risk factors in pregnant women of tribal community attending antenatal clinic at Trivandrum district, Kerala, India

M. S. Ponny1,2, V. R. Nandini1*, C. Nirmala1, Brahmanandan Mayadevi1


1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meditrina Hospitals, Kollam, Kerala, India

Received: 05April 2021

Accepted: 05 May 2021

*Correspondence:

Dr. V. R. Nandini,

E-mail: nandini_2470525@yahoo.com

Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background: Anemia is a major preventable public health concern among the pregnant women worldwide. The present study aims at determining the prevalence of anemia among tribal pregnant women at Trivandrum district, Kerala and identifying its socioeconomic and gynaecological risk factors.

Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted among tribal women attending antenatal clinics of Vithura and Kuttichal Government hospitals at Kerala, India. Sample size was calculated as 117. All consecutive subjects fitting the inclusion criteria were included in the study until the sample size was achieved. Patients were interviewed using a semi structured questionnaire which includes socio demographic, cultural and nutritional factors. Hemoglobin measurement was done while first antenatal visit using semi auto hemo-analyzer. Data obtained were analyzed using SPSS software. Statistical test used was either Chi-square test or student t-test.

Results: The prevalence of anemia among the tribal pregnant women attending primary health care in Trivandrum during the study tenure was 53.33%. The prevalence of mild, moderate and severe anemia was observed as 26.66%, 25% and 1.66% respectively. The mean serum haemoglobin level among the study group was found to be 10.64 gm%. The major risk factors associated with anemia were figured out to be low body mass index, low family income, high parity, joint family, exposure to passive smoking and pan chewing, irregular intake of iron and folic acid supplements, hyperemesis and absence of deworming.

Conclusions: Focus shall be given on creating awareness among tribal women regarding the need for dietary and lifestyle modification to decrease the prevalence of anemia among them.

Keywords: Anemia, Habit disturbances, Standard of living, Pregnant Women, Prevalence studies, Tribal population

INTRODUCTION

Of the many health problems affecting pregnant women in India, anemia is considered as a major public health concern. Internationally it was pronounced that, out of all the population at-risk of anemia, it is only among pregnant women that anemia is a public health problem.1 According to the world health organization report, the prevalence of anemia is estimated to be in a range of 41.96-57.19% with an average of 50.13% among pregnant women in India.2 According to NFHS 4 data of Kerala state, the prevalence of anemia among women of all age group is 34.3% which is lower when compared to other Indian states.3 The maternal mortality rate of Kerala was 61 in the year 2011 which has been reduced to 42 by the year 2019.4 This might be attributed to a very strong primary health care system prevalent in Kerala with excellent infrastructure development and social development indices at par with the western world.

There is a vicious link exists between prevalence of anemia and socioeconomic status of the people. It is obvious but factual that the occurrence of anemia is more in rural areas as compared to urban areas.5 The prevalence further increases in demeaned population such as in tribal population.6 According to the 2011 census report, 10.4% of Indian population is made up of scheduled tribes. The population of scheduled tribes in Kerala state is 4,84,839 (1.45% of the total state population) which includes 246,636 females. As per the latest survey, Trivandrum occupies of about 17185 people in 5183 tribal families which comes around 4.03% of total tribal population in Kerala. Majority of the tribal population in Trivandrum comprises of Kanikars. Nearly one fifth of Kanikkar community is settled in Vithura grama panchayat.7 Various Government/NGO sponsored community health programs have not reached among the marginalized tribal population because of their geographic distribution, illiteracy, social and cultural practices and lack of awareness. Although a handful of reports are available on anemia among women and adolescent girls in urban and rural areas, there are hardly any community level studies done so far to address this burning issue among the pregnant women of tribal community. Hence this study was undertaken with the objective of estimating the prevalence of anemia and identifying its socioeconomic and gynecological risk factors among pregnant women of tribal community presenting in primary care centers at Trivandrum district, Kerala.

METHODS

Current study was conducted as a hospital based cross-sectional study in two primary care centers within Trivandrum district, Kerala. Tribal women attending Vithura and Kuttichal Government hospitals located in Trivandrum district for antenatal care (ANC) aged between 15-49 years were included in the study after taking informed consent. Those women who have undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the past six months were excluded. The study period was from April 2018 to October 2019. The required sample size for the study was calculated using the formulae for sampling proportions and percentage.

n=4pQ/D2

Where p was the expected prevalence character (from published literature), Q was 100-p and D was the precision. Taking the prevalence of anemia among tribal pregnant women as 92% as per the study conducted by Corrêa et al.8 and with absolute precision of 5%, the sample size was calculated as 117. Using convenient sampling, 120 pregnant tribal women were interviewed. Data collection was done using a semi-structured questionnaire. Each subject was interviewed individually in Malayalam language since Malayalam is the local language in Kerala, and later converted to English for documentation. Data on physical characteristics, socioeconomic variables, antenatal factors and menstrual history were included in the questionnaire. Hemoglobin values measured on their booking visit was documented. Both institutions use semi auto hemo-analyser with electrical resistance method for hemoglobin measurement. BMI was measured using stadiometer corrected to 0.1 cm and weighing machine corrected to 0.5 kg. Anemia was defined and classified according to WHO criteria. Anemia in pregnancy was defined as hemoglobin less than 11 g%. Severity was categorized as mild 10 g%-10.9 g%, moderate 7 g%-9.9 g% and severe <7 g%.9

Data entry and analysis was done on SPSS version 15. Chi-square test and regression were used for analysis. Quantitative variables were represented using mean or standard deviation, p<0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

The prevalence of anemia in the study population (N=120) was found to be 53.33% (Figure 1A). The relative prevalence of mild, moderate and severe anemia was estimated as 26.66%, 25% and 1.66% respectively. The mean hemoglobin value among the 120 subject samples studied was 10.64 gm%.

The median hemoglobin was found to be 10.8±1.38 gm% (Figure 1B). Among 120 pregnant tribal women participated in the study, the mean age of study group was 25.8 with majority subjects (46.7%) lies within 20-24 age group. Age of the study group did not show any significant association with the occurrence of anemia (Table 1).

Table 1: Association of age group and prevalence of anemia (n=120).
Table reproduced from source PDF page 2
Table 2: Bivariate analysis of physical characteristics of study population.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

*p< 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Table 3: Bivariate analysis of Socioeconomic variables in study population.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

*p< 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Physical characteristics of subjects

Among the study population, 63% were found to be underweight and the mean weight of the study population was 43.51 kg. The median weight was 42±6.9 kg. The mean BMI of the study population was 18.87 kg/m2. Our study reported that around 2.39 times more chance of developing anemia in women who are underweight compared to those with normal BMI (p=0.019). Among the primi-gravidas 54.8% had no anemia whereas, 25.85% and 17.7% of them had mild and moderate anemia respectively. In second gravida group, the percentage of mild and moderate anemia increases to 30.6 and 22.2% respectively. In multi gravidas women the percentage of mild and moderate anemia further increased to 22.7% and 50% respectively. Multiparous women have 3.69 times more chance of developing anemia compared to primi-gravida and second gravid subjects (p=0.013). Body weight of the subjects and the age of the marriage do not have any significant impact on the prevalence of anemia (Table 2).

Table 4: Bivariate analysis of antenatal risk variables in study population.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 4

*p<0.05 considered statistically significant, #there were no study Subjects without anemia and an irregular intake of iron and folic acid supplements.

Table 5: Bivariate analysis of menstrual variables in study population.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 4

*p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Socio economic factors

We observed that 90.83% of the subjects under study have education status up to high school or above but could not correlate it significantly with the severity of anemia (p=0.472). 95% of our study population comes under below poverty line (BPL) as per the local government norms. The women with anemia in families with monthly income less than Rs. 10000 ($135) were found to have 25.8% mild and 35.5% moderate anemia. It further reduced to 26.7% mild anemia and 14.9% moderate anemia in women belonging to families with monthly income more than Rs.10000 ($135). Statistically we report that women from low-income family have 2.47 times more chance of developing anemia than that from a high-income family (p=0.023). Among the 15 women (12.5%) who have the habit of pan chewing among the study subjects, 33.3% have mild anemia and 53.3% have moderate anemia. Similarly, out of 39 subjects exposed to smoking or passive smoking, 30.8% and 53.8% of them had mild and moderate anemia respectively. Further we showed that, pan chewing and passive smoking (30.8%) were found to have closely associated with the prevalence of anemia with an odd ratio of 15.40 (p<0.001) and 11.56 (p<0.001) respectively (Table 3).

Antenatal risk factors of anemia

Our study claims that 82.5% of the study population had regular intake of iron and folic acid supplements. Undoubtedly, we report that irregular intake of iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy significantly foster the chance for anemia (p<0.001). Anemia was less prevalent in those women who had followed regular de worming schedule. Among those women who have not taken anti-helminths, the percentage of mild and moderate anemia patients was as high as 28.1% and 40.4 % respectively. We also reported that anemia is more common (2.56 times) in those women whose pregnancy is complicated with hyperemesis gravidarum (p=0.03). Those women with hyperemesis gravidarum are complicated by 26.7% mild anemia and 36.7 % moderate anemia (Table 4).

Menstrual history

In our study, 33.3% of the study population had heavy menstrual bleeding. Those subjects with a history of heavy menstrual flow showed high prevalence of mild (42.5%) and moderate anemia (32.5%) in our study. Those women with heavy menstrual bleeding had six times more chance of developing anemia during gestation compared to those with normal menstrual bleeding (p<0.001). We could not find any significant association between age of menarche and irregular menstrual cycles with the development of anemia (Table 5).

The multivariate association of various statistically significant factors like deworming, exposure to pan-chewing and history of heavy menstrual bleeding, shows they are independent risk factors for anemia (Table 6).

Table 6: Multivariate analysis of association of risk factors for the prevalence of anemia.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 5

*p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Kerala has been widely honoured for better medical care system among other Indian states and has the highest literacy rate and the improved infant and maternal mortality rate. In the current study we found that the relative prevalence of anemia among the 120 study subjects of pregnant women of tribal population at Trivandrum district is 53.33%. Among the anemic persons, majority cases were of mild anemic (26.66%) immediately followed by moderate anemia (25%) and a small proportion of population who had severe anemia (1.66%). In a cross-sectional study conducted at Karnataka in 2019, majority (89%) of the tribal women under study had anemia in which 62% and 11% of tribal women had moderate and severe anemia, respectively.10 A very high anemia burden of 92.4% was reported by Correa et al among pregnant women in the forested tribal areas of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Chhattisgarh in India.8 The prevalence of anemia has decreased in our study compared to the previous studies probably because of improved access to health care system or the various healthcare projects implemented at the grass root level to outreach the marginalized tribal populations.

The current study did not show any significant association between the marriage age of tribal women and prevalence for anemia in contrast to the results obtained in a study by Perumal where they reported that increasing age at marriage is a significant protective factor of anemia among rural pregnant women in India.11 This may be due to the extensive awareness campaigns and education programs by Government and social organizations which may have brought about some impact on the tribal population that the number of teenage marriages and pregnancies have come down to a great extent. High parity is among the factors with etiologic potential in causing anemia during pregnancy.12 Current study observed that there is a statistically significant association between multi parity and development of anemia. In corroboration to our results, Al-Farsi et al stated that high parity is an important risk factor in the development of anemia in pregnancy based on a retrospective cohort study conducted in Oman. This could be due to the increased susceptibility to hemorrhage and maternal nutritional depletion syndrome associated with the multiple delivery.13

Figure 1: A) Pie diagram showing the prevalence of anemia among the tribal pregnant women of the study population (n=120), B) Histogram showing the mean and median hemoglobin level among the tribal pregnant women of the study population (n=120).
Figure 1: A) Pie diagram showing the prevalence of anemia among the tribal pregnant women of the study population (n=120), B) Histogram showing the mean and median hemoglobin level among the tribal pregnant women of the study population (n=120).

Present study did not show any significant difference in the incidence of anemia among women whether belonging to joint family or nuclear family or based on the economic strata they fit in. In contrast to the results we obtained, Ismail et al had showed a statistical significance with the higher socioeconomic class having less predilection for anemia.14 Kerala being the state with the highest literacy rate in the country, the data analysis showed that 90.8% of the study subjects and 77.5% of their spouses were educated up to high school or above. Our study did not show significant relation between the educational status of husband and wife with the incidence of anemia unlike the result reported by Agarwal et al who had conducted study in various cluster populations within India and Lokare et al who had selected a study population from Aurangabad, India.15,16

Exposure to either or both passive smoking and pan-chewing are established as risk factors for the development of anemia among tribal pregnant women. In addition to the prevalence for anemia maternal exposure to tobacco whilst pregnancy has also been reportedly associated with still birth conditions and can increase the risk of low birth weight.17 The higher prevalence rate of anemia with pan chewing and passive smoking obtained in our study may be attributed to the fact that these personal vices are quite common in public places and in workplaces especially in this part of our country and there are no strict laws prohibiting the use of smoke products at the public places. Similar results were reported in the study by Ismail et al, Shrinivasa et al and Goel et al.6,14,18

A cross sectional study among antenatal women attending municipal hospital at Ghana reported that women who had visited hospital during the first trimester were 8.2 times more protected for anemia than those who had visited later during the pregnancy.19 However, in our study the statistical analysis did not show any significant correlation between late ANC registration and chance for anemia occurrence. Further we realized that those women with hyperemesis gravidarum during the antenatal period are 2.56 times more prone to develop anemia during their gestation. The association of hyperemesis gravidarum with the development of anemia could be influenced by the chronic H. pylori infection.20 The regular intake of iron and folic acid supplements was associated with less incidence of anemia in the present study subjects compared with those who were noncompliant to supplementary iron. Recent study by Abiselvi et al also elicited that women having irregular intake of iron and folic acid supplements have 1.5 % times higher chance of developing anemia compared to the ones taking supplements regularly.21 WHO recommends prophylactic dose of using single dose albendazole (400 mg) or mebendazole (500 mg), as a public health intervention for pregnant women.22 Current study confirmed the importance of deworming which has a positive influence in preventing anemia among the pregnant subjects. Similarly has been reported by Abiselvi et al with an odd ratio of 12.4.21 On analyzing the descriptive statistics of our study results, we revealed that women with history of heavy menstrual bleeding have six times more chance of developing anemia compared with those having normal menstrual flow. It was also identified as an independently significant variable on multivariate analysis. The excessive blood loss during the menstrual period may contribute to iron deficiency anemia (IDA) to the subjects.23 Our study results are corroborating with the reports by Weldekedan et al.24 It is a known fact there is a relationship between iron deficiency anemia and irregular cycles among the women, but we could not find any association between the irregularity in menstrual cycle with the prevalence of anemia in pregnant ladies of our study population. Study by Sreelekshmi et al also revealed similar results in a study conducted among tribal women at Palakkad district, Kerala.25

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of anemia among tribal women attending antenatal clinics in primary care hospitals at Trivandrum district was found to be 53.33%. The relative prevalence of mild, moderate and severe anemia were observed as 26.66%, 25% and 1.66% respectively. The main risk factors of anemia in pregnant women are figured out to be low body mass index, low family income, high parity, exposure to passive smoking and pan-chewing, irregular intake of iron and folic acid supplements, hyperemesis and absence of deworming. The data obtained in our study would provide an insight to the health status of tribal population of Kerala and further would help the policy makers for devoting to reduce the mortality and morbidity issues among them.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors are thankful to medical officers of Kuttichal and Vithura primary health centres for their unequivocal support while conducting the study. Authors are also thankful to Dr. Pratheesh Mankuzhy, Assistant Professor, KVASU for helping in preparing the manuscript meticulously.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Donahue Angel M, Berti P, Siekmans K, Tugirimana PL, Boy E. Prevalence of Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anemia in the Northern and Southern Provinces of Rwanda. Food Nutr Bull. 2017;38:554-63.
  2. 2. Prevalence of Anemia in pregnant women. Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4552. Accessed on 20 February 2021.
  3. 3. Indian Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and MoHFW. Available at: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/NFHS-4Reports/Kerala.pdf). Accessed on 3 March 2021.
  4. 4. Sample registration system, office of the registrar general and census commissioner; 2019. Available at: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Vital_Statistics/SRS/Sample_Registration_System.asp x. Accessed on 3 March, 2021
  5. 5. Ortega P, Leal J, Amaya D, Chávez, C. Nutritional evaluation, micronutrient deficiencies and anemia among female adolescents in an urban and a rural zone from Zulia state, Venezuela. Invest Clin. 2010;51:37-52.
  6. 6. Shrinivasa BM, Philip RR, Krishnapali VK, Suraj A, Sreelakshmi P. Prevalence of anemia among tribal women of reproductive age-group in Wayanad district of Kerala. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2014;3:120-4.
  7. 7. Statistics profile of scheduled tribes in India, office of the registrar general andcensus commissioner, government of India. Available at: https://censusindia.gov.in/census_and_you/scheduled_castes_and_sceduled_tribes.aspx. Accessed on 3 March 2021.
  8. 8. Corrêa G, Das M, Kovelamudi R, Jaladi N, Pignon C, Vysyaraju K, et al. High burden of malaria and anemia among tribal pregnant women in a chronic conflict corridor in India. Confl Health. 2017;11:10.
  9. 9. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and mineral nutrition information system. Available at: https://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin/en/. Accessed on 3 March 2021.
  10. 10. Rohisha IK, Jose TT, and Chakrabarty J. Prevalence of anemia among tribal women. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:145-7.
  11. 11. Perumal V. Reproductive risk factors assessment for anaemia among pregnant womenin India using a multinomial logistic regression model. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19:841- 51.
  12. 12. Rooney C. Antenatal care and maternal health: how effective is it? A review of the evidence. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59954. Accessed on 3 March 2021.
  13. 13. Al-Farsi YM, Brooks DR, Werler MM, Cabral HJ, Al-Shafei MA, Wallenburg HC. Effect of high parity on occurrence of anemia in pregnancy: a cohort study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2011;11:7.
  14. 14. Ismail IM, Kahkashan A, Antony A, Sobhith VK. Role of socio-demographic and cultural factors on anemia in a tribal population of North Kerala, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3:1183-8.
  15. 15. Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Sharma A, Sharma K, Prasad K, Kalita MC, et al. Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant & lactating women in India. Indian J Med Res. 2006;124:173- 84.
  16. 16. Lokare PO, Karajekar VD, Gattani PL, Kulkarni AP. A study of prevalance of anemia and socio demographic factors associated with anaemia among pregnant women in Aurangabad city, India. Ann Nigerian Med. 2012;6:30-4.
  17. 17. Leonardi-Bee J, Britton J, Venn A. Second hand smoke and adverse fetal outcomes in nonsmoking pregnant women: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2011; 127:734-41.
  18. 18. Goel P, Radotra A, Singh I, Aggarwal A, Dua D. Effects of passive smoking on outcome in pregnancy. J Postgrad Med. 2004;50:12-6.
  19. 19. Anlaakuu P, Anto F. Anaemia in pregnancy and associated factors: a cross sectional study of antenatal attendants at the Sunyani Municipal Hospital, Ghana. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:402.
  20. 20. Kitila KT, Sori LM, Desalegn DM, Tullu KD. Burden of Helicobacter pylori infections and associated risk factors among women of child bearing age in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Chronic Dis. 2018;2018: 5183713.
  21. 21. Abiselvi A, Gopalakrishnan S, Umadevi R, Rama R. Anaemia in pregnancy. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(2):721-7.
  22. 22. World Health Organization, recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf. Accessed on 3 March 2021.
  23. 23. Mishra V, Verneker R, Gandhi K, Choudhary S, Lamba S. Iron deficiency anemia with menorrhagia: ferric carboxy-maltose a safer alternative to blood transfusion. J Mid-life Health. 2018;9:92-6.
  24. 24. Weldekidan F, Kote M, Girma M, Boti N, Gultie T. Determinants of anemia among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in public health facilities at Durame Town: unmatched case control study. Anemia. 2018;2018:8938307.
  25. 25. Mohandas S, Amritesh K, Lais H, Vasudevan S, Ajithakumari S. Nutritional assessment of tribal women in Kainatty, Wayanad: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Community Med. 2019;44:58-63.