International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health

Kaushal SK et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Sep;8(9):4531-4536

http://www.ijcmph.com

pISSN2394-6032 | eISSN2394-6040

Association of socio-demographic characteristics with knowledge and perception about disease among newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients in western Utter Pradesh: a cross-sectional study

Suneel Kumar Kaushal1, Sonal Dhaked2*


1Department of Community Medicine, Government Allopathic Medical College, Banda, Uttar Pradesh, India

2Department of Community Medicine, American International Institute of Medical Science, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Received: 05 July 2021

Accepted: 13 August 2021

*Correspondence:

Dr. Sonal Dhaked,

E-mail: ssonal.04@gmail.com

Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background: TB is one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide. The risk of TB is high among populations living in poverty, low socioeconomic groups, low income, immune-suppressed (including AIDS), and extreme age (old age and children) groups, etc.

Methods: The study was conducted in TB and chest department of Sarojini Naidu medical college Agra city. The total number of patients registered during the period of July to September 2017 was 518; out of these 288 were new pulmonary and extrapulmonary patients. Out of 288 subjects, 123 were pulmonary patients. All the 123 new pulmonary tuberculosis patients (both smear +ve and smear -ve) were included in the study. 18 patients were loss to follow up after registration thus final effective sample size was 105 for further follow-up study.

Results: Overwhelming (84.76%) patients belonged to a lower socioeconomic class. The maximum number (85.33%) of the study subjects among upper lower socioeconomic status had no knowledge regarding causative microbes of the disease (p=0.001).

Conclusions: The majority of patients belong to illiterate, lower socioeconomic group, married and other than general cast, living in a joint, overcrowded family with more than four family members. About half of the subjects not knowing the method of prevention & consequence of treatment interruption. Most of them felt that quality of life affected after disease and about 1/4th of them felt hurtful behaviour of family members.

Keywords: Tuberculosis, Sociodemographic factors, Knowledge, Perception

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis has disease of public health importance since ages and affect large quantum of socioeconomic cost on the society. The risk of TB transmission also increases with overcrowding, intimacy, duration of contact and infectiousness of the TB patients.1

The epidemiology of tuberculosis reflects how these social determinants are distributed, with a clear influence in all stages of TB pathogenesis: risk of exposure, susceptibility to progression of disease, time to diagnosis and treatment, compliance and successful treatment.2 Major problems in controlling TB burden ispoor knowledge of transmission and prevention of TB.3,4

Aim

With this back ground this study was designed to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with knowledge and perception about TB transmission, symptoms and treatment among adult population of Agra.

METHODS

Study design and duration

The study was descriptive cross sectional type and conducted in Agra city. Newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients of age 18 years and above registered under RNTCP in tertiary care DOTS center of Sarojini Naidu Medical College Agra were included in the study fr during three month period from July to september 2017.

Data collection

The questionnaire was prepared in hindi and contained both closed and open ended questions. Data was collected by personal interview method after obtaining informed written consent by the participants. A pilot study was under taken among 10% of subjects and preliminary analysis was done to reformate and to prepare the final questionnaire. The data was collected at designated microscopic centre located in TB and chest department of S.N.M. college Agra.

Sample size

Total number of patients registered during the period of three month were 518, out of which 288 were ‘new pulmonary’ and ‘new extra pulmonary’ patients. Of the 288 new pulmonary and extrapulmonary patients, 123 were pulmonary patients. 18 patients were loss to follow up after registration thus final effective sample size was 105 for futher study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All the 123 new pulmonary tuberculosis patients (both smere +ve and smere -ve) were included in the study. In current study if one or more windows were open in living room or in open area was considered as adequate ventilation. The patients who were seriously illl & infected with HIV, extrapulmonary TB and other than category-I and not reside in Agra were excluded from our study.

Statistical analysis

The information collected in Microsoft excel sheet and then it was cleaned for missing values and typing errors. The age, gender, education, caste, socio-economic status, types of family, number of members in the family and addiction were determined in number and percentage. Also for categorical variable chi square test and fisher exact test was used. The p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Case definition; classification based on history of TB treatment and lost to follow-up: TB patients who did not start treatment or whose treatment was interrupted for 2 consecutive months or more. New patients: have never been treated for TB or have taken anti-TB drugs for less than 1 month.

RESULTS

Out of 105 patients more than half (57%) were male. One third of male patients (22 out of 60) were in the age group of 18-25 years.

Table 1: Characteristics of study population (n=105).
Table reproduced from source PDF page 2

Nearly half of female (21 out of 45) were in the age group of 18-25 years. In almost all the age groups, male to female ratio was 1:1 except for the older age (≥46 years). 42.85% subjects were illiterate. Overwhelming (84.76%) belonged to lower class. More than half (60%) of the patients come under other backward class. Maximum number (84.76%) of study subjects were living in a joint family. More than half (57.14%) of study subject had no history of addiction. 40% of the study population had some history of close contact with other TB patients in family, neighbourhood and at their place of work. Almost two third (64.76%) of the study subject were living in a overcrowding condition (according to number of persons living per room). Nearly one third of the study subjects (31.42%) were living in poorly ventilated house (Table 1). Among all subjects, only 20.95% had correct knowledge that disease is caused by a microorganism. 40.95% knew that it is transmitted by cough and sneezing from a patient. Majority of the subjects had no knowledge (49.52%) of its mode of transmission. Multiple responses were obtained from subject regarding symptom of the disease and commonest responses was cough >2 week (96.19%) and other common responses were weakness (75.23%), fever (58.09%), breathlessness (45.71%), and weight reduction (45.71%) (Table 2).

Table 2: Knowledge regarding disease causative agents, mode of transmission and disease symptoms*.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

*(multiple responses)

76.19% of study subjects felt ashamed after being diagnosed as a case of TB. Nearly one third think about disease occur to any person. Family member of most of the study subjects (94.28%) knew about the disease status of the subject. But the behaviour of the family member towards the patients is not satisfactory in one fourth (26.26%) of the subjects. Quality of life were deteriorated due to disease in maximum number of subjects (98.09%) (Table 3). Maximum number (85.33%) of the study subjects among upper lower socioeconomic status had no knowledge regarding causative microbes of the disease. Socio-economic status wise comparison of their knowledge regarding causative microbes was done, differences were found to be statistically highly significant (p value=0.001) (Table 4).

Table 3: Perception of study group regarding tuberculosis disease (n=105)*.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

DISCUSSION

It was observed that more males (57.5 %) were affected than females (42.85%) and among male age groups 18-25 years were maximally affected (36.66%), while among female it was in the age group 18-35 years (70%). It was further observed that tuberculosis affected more in younger 18-25 years age group (40.95%) and older age groups ≥46 years (28.57%) as compared to 36- 45 years age group (13.33%). A study carried out among newly diagnosed pulmonary TB patients in Chennai by found that males were affected more (61.9%) as compared to female (38.1%) which is similar to our finding.2 Similar observation was also made by a in his study carried out in Wardha Maharashtra.5-9 Also in their prospective study in Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh also observed higher case detection rate in males (72.2%) as compared to the females (27.8%) and also maximum number of cases (43.4%) were in the younger age group of 15-30 years.10 In present study majority (84.76%) of subjects belonged to lower class, similarly in their study found maximum subjects belonged to lower socioeconomic status.11 While contrary to present study, Jebamalar et al in their study reported maximum number of tuberculosis patients belong to middle class followed by upper middle and least among lower class, which may be because their study drew patients from a municipal corporation zone of a metropolitan city, the zone might have predominantly habited by middle and upper class. In present study maximum (42.85%) patients were illiterate. Esmael et al in their study also found pulmonary tuberculosis was more among illiterates.

Table 4: Association between socio-demographic characteristics with disease characteristics.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 4

However in another study reported that maximum number of cases were among primary to high school educated people and minimum among the illiterate which is contrary to our finding and might be because of regional variations, and the difference in study design as theirs was a community based study in a zone of metropolitan city Chennai corporation and hence reflects zone specific characteristics while the present study being in medical college catered to wide range of patients from urban slums as well as rural areas.2 In our study majority of the subject belong to SC/ST and other backword caste (79.04%). Prevalence of tuberculosis among SC/ST and OBC reported higher.13 In the present study majority of the tuberculosis patients belonged to joint family (84.7%).

Majority of patients belonged to family size of more than 4 members (81.96%). Aurora et al in his study also observed that most of them lived in joint family (88.7%) In the present study more than one third of the study subjects had some or the other type of addiction, of which tobacco and smoking was the commonest (25.7% and 21.9% respectively).14 Overcrowding was present in 64.76% subjects. Similarly reported in their study that 29% of the tuberculosis patients correctly knew the cause of TB.15 In our study 40.95% of respondent were knew the fact that disease is transmitted by coughing and sneezing while half (49.9%) of the subjects said that they do not knew the mode of transmission. Sharma et al found that 70.6% study subject have correct knowledge of mode of transmission which is higher than that in our study and it might be because study was conducted in metropolitan city Delhi where level of literacy and awareness is much higher than present study area. Shreeramareddy et al. reported slightly higher (55.5%) of the study subjects correctly knowing the mode of transmission than the present study the variation may be because study was based on analysis of secondary data.16 More than half (55.23%) of the subjects had no knowledge of disease prevention, while 44.0% said that the disease could be prevented, among them all knew that the disease could prevented by covering mouth and nose during coughing and sneezing. In variance to ours study one fourth (25%) of the respondent were not aware of any methods of prevention, the difference might be because the study was community based on general population of tribal area of MP, while ours was hospital based among TB patients. In another study reported that majority (98.2%) responded said that the disease is preventable, comparatively batter knowledge regarding prevention of the disease may be because of the study was carried out in general population of metropolitan city Delhi.15 In the present study most (84.0%) people opined that the disease is cured by allopathic medicine. Almost two third (68.57%) responded that treatment duration is long and almost all (95.23%) responded that treatment is freely available. When asked about the consequence of the treatment interruption, almost half (48.5%) of subjects knew about it. Similarly, Shreeramareddy et al observed that 83.5% of the study subjects knew that TB is curable. Palashdas et al also found that 82.7% study subject had correct knowledge about the disease curability. Two third (68.57%) of the study subjects knew that tuberculosis required long duration of treatment. Putera et al also found in their study that 77.62% of the study population correctly knew the long duration of the treatment, also reported in their study that 60.64% of the study participants correctly knew the long duration of the disease.11 In our study almost three fourth (76.19%) of the study subjects felt ashamed after knowing their disease status, and nearly one fourth (26.26%) of study subjects felt hatred by behaviour of their family members. Almost all (98%) of the study subjects felt that their quality of life was affected due to disease. In the present study 18.09% subjects believed that the disease is result of their old sin or curse. Similar finding reported by (in their study.15 Mushtaq et al in their study also found that 76.3% of their participants felt shameful or embarrassed due to disease. 72.2% of study subjects said that the behaviour of the family members was helpful while 8.1% study subjects were hated by their family members. Also in another study they found that 95.4% of the patient’s family members were cooperative to the subject.15

CONCLUSION

Females of 18 to 35 years of age group were more vulnerable to disease; females and for male of age 46 or more and 18-25 years respectively were more affected. Majority of them belong to illiterate, lower socioeconomic group, married and other then general cast, living in joint, overcrowded family with more than four family members. About 40% of subject having history of contact and contact were mainly from family. About 1/3rd of them correctly know the cause of tuberculosis and mode of transmission. Most common perceived symptoms were found as cough, weakness and fever. About half of subject not knowing the method of prevention and consequence of treatment interruption. Most of them felt that quality of life affected after disease and about 1/4th of then felt hurtful behaviour of family members.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors would like to thank Dr. Santosh Kumar, professor and head, department of TB and chest for his support.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Noah N. ‘Tuberculosis’ controlling communicable disease. In: Understanding public health. London: Open University Press; 2006:157-70.
  2. 2. Jebamalar J, Senthilkumar P, Ramola M. Health seeking behaviour in pulmonary tuberculosis: a cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5:1346-53.
  3. 3. Alotaibi SM, Almoshadq AF, Alghanmi HA. Poor Knowledge of tuberculosis among the population of Jeddah and Makkah Saudi Arabia, a High-Risk Area. J Tuberc Res. 2016;4:81-91.
  4. 4. Sharma N. Awareness and perception about tuberculosis in the general population of Delhi. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2007;19(2):10-5.
  5. 5. Hargreaves JR, Boccia D, Evans CA, Adato M, Petticrew M, Porter JDH. The social determinants of tuberculosis: from evidence to action. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:654-62.
  6. 6. Abebe R, Demissie M. Assessment of knowledge and practices related to tuberculosis and associated factors among HIV positive people in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Global J Med Public Health. 2012;1:2.
  7. 7. Shargie EB, Lindtjørn B. Determinants of treatment adherence among smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Southern Ethiopia. PLoS Med. 2007;4(2):e37.
  8. 8. Technical and operational guidelines for tuberculosis control in India report, 2016. Available at: https//tbcindia.gov.in. Accessed on 20 October 2019.
  9. 9. Mundra A, Pradeep R. Deshmukh AD. Magnitude and determinants of adverse treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients registered under Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program in a Tuberculosis Unit, Wardha, Central India: A record-based cohort study. JEGH. 2017;2:2-9.
  10. 10. Kanungo S, Khan Z, Ansari MA, Abedi AJ. Role of sociodemographic factors in tuberculosis treatment outcome: A prospective study in Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2015;8:55-9.
  11. 11. Mushtaq MU. Knowledge attitudes and prectices regarding tuberculosis in two districts of Panjab, Pakistan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007;14(3):303-10.
  12. 12. Ahmed E, Ibrahim A, Mulualem A, Adinew D. Assessment of patients’ knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding pulmonary tuberculosis in eastern Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia: cross-sectional study: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 88(4);2013:785-8.
  13. 13. Das S, Basu M, Mandal A, Roy N, Chatterjee S, Dasgupta A. Prevalence and determinants of delay in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Darjeeling district of West Bengal. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017;6:627-35.
  14. 14. Aurora H, Kapoor S. Determinants of lost to follow up during treatment among tuberculosis patients in Delhi. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2016;5:145152.
  15. 15. Putera. Knowledge and perception of tuberculosis and the risk to become treatment default among newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients treated in primary health care, East Nusa Tenggara: a retrospective study. BMC. 2015;8:238.
  16. 16. Sreeramareddy. Prevalence of self-reported tuberculosis, knowledge about tuberculosis transmission and its determinants among adults in India: results from a nation-wide cross-sectional household survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:16.
  17. 17. Rao VG, Yadav R, Bhat J, Tiwari BK, Bhondeley MK. Knowledge and attitude towards tuberculosis amongst the tribal population of Jhabua, Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Tuberc. 2012;59(4):243-8.
  18. 18. Palash Das. Perception of tuberculosis among general patients of tertiary care hospitals of Bengal Lung India. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2012;29(4):319-24.
  19. 19. Saria T, Aminur R. Patient’s knowledge and attitude towards tuberculosis in an urban setting. Pulmonary Med. 2012;2012:850-5
  20. 20. Kolappan C, Gopi PG, Subramani R, Narayanan PR. Selected biological and behavioural risk factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;11(9):999-1003.
  21. 21. Sifrash MG. Socioeconomic factors associated with knowledge on tuberculosis among adults. In: Tuberculosis research and treatment. Ethiopia: Hindawi Publishing Corporation. 2016.