International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health

Deshmukh JS et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2022 Jun;9(6):2545-2549

http://www.ijcmph.com

pISSN 2394-6032 | eISSN 2394-6040

Burnout syndrome among resident doctors in a tertiary medical college in central India-a cross-sectional study

Jyotsna S. Deshmukh, Nidhi J. Vithalani*


Department of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Received: 07 April 2022

Accepted: 29 April 2022

*Correspondence:

Dr. Nidhi J. Vithalani,

E-mail: drnidhijv@gmail.com

Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background: Practice of medicine is associated with a high level of occupational stress and burnout. Residents face lot of stress because of the workload and heavy duties as well as a large volume of scientific literature and practical tasks which must be learnt in a limited time. Very few studies from India have evaluated psychological issues, stress, and burnout among medical professionals with few studies focusing on resident doctors.

Methods: The invitation link of the survey in the form of Google forms was sent to all residents working in the institute. Although the survey was kept anonymous, personal details relating to the participant’s demographics, academic qualifications, working hours was recorded. The Copenhagen burnout inventory (CBI) scale was utilized to assess the prevalence of burnout. The data obtained were analysed using SPSS-20.0.

Results: The average age of respondents was 28 years. The 48.8% (77) residents work for 41-60 hours/week while 57.59% (91) residents have <2 years of experience in government hospital. The 39.24% (62) had the scores that indicate the total burnout. it was found that personal burnout scores, work related burnout scores and personal burnout scores are comparatively higher in 1st year of residency as compared to 2nd and 3rd year of residency. Overall burnout in 1st year residents was significantly high compared to 2nd and 3rd year residents.

Conclusions: Burnout syndrome was significantly high among resident doctors. Attention should be directed to identifying the symptoms of burnout syndrome and addressing them through strategies on various levels.

Keywords: Burnout, Residents, Occupational stress, CBI

INTRODUCTION

The practice of medicine is unique. It is more challenging than any other profession in the world. It is associated with a great degree of both personal and professional satisfaction, but also with a high level of occupational stress and burnout. Stress is known as a biological and psychological process which is experienced by a person while dealing with the environmental threats. Occupational stress, is the biological and psychological effects of negative interaction between work conditions and person’s knowledge, skills, or expectations. Occupational stress can lead to poor health and even individual damage.1

While burnout is defined as “a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment that can occur among individuals who work with people in some capacity.” It is considered as an outcome of long-term exposure to occupational stress.2 Burnout occurs when there is no coordination between responsibilities and pressures and personal abilities, characteristics and needs. There are a variety of stressors in medical workplace. It is suggested that burnout begins to start during the medical graduation days only. It continues to grow throughout the residency period, and finally matures in the daily life of practicing physicians.3 Studies suggest that the prevalence of burnout among residents varies from 50% to 76%, depending on the speciality.4

Residents face lot of stress because of the workload and heavy duties as well as a large volume of scientific literature and practical tasks which must be learnt in a limited time.5,6 In addition, there are other issues identified as being stressful for residents, such as financial problems and low income, being evaluated without enough training, and being under psychological and physical pressure from both their superiors and patients. Stress can also be the result of any workplace stressors which are related to role conflicts (such as the conflict between duty to supervisors, or attending physicians and patients expectation), role ambiguities (the tasks were not defined well) and role overload (too many tasks and daily work load for the available time, and other constraints in fulfilling heavy duty expected from them and responsibility for patients’ health.1,7,8 So, depression and anxiety during residency is common and are certainly affects the quality of patient’s care.9

Very few studies from India have evaluated psychological issues, stress, and burnout among medical professionals. These studies have been mostly limited to medical students and interns, with few studies focusing on resident doctors.10-14 Studies have reported that about one-third of the resident doctors experience stress.13 Studies among medical students have reported the existence of stress among three-fourth of the participants.14 It has also evaluated the barriers in seeking psychiatric help and these suggest that stigma, confidentiality issues, lack of awareness, and fear of unwanted intervention to be the major reasons for not seeking help related to mental health issues.15 Medical professionals are also prone to develop substance-use disorders.16

So, this study is done to estimate the prevalence of burnout and variables associated with it among resident doctors working in tertiary care hospital in central India.

METHODS

Study type

The study type used was of questionnaire-based cross-sectional study.

Study participants

Resident doctors working in Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur.

Study tool and data collection

The invitation link of the study in the form of Google forms was sent to all residents working in the institute. The invitation link stated that the participation was voluntary and completion of questionnaire reflected their consent to participate. The questionnaire was sent twice during the weekends for 6 consecutive weekends. In case someone did not respond at the first instance, weekly reminders were sent for the next 5 weeks. Confidentiality of the information was maintained and no personal information of participants was disclosed to anyone. Although the survey was kept anonymous, personal details relating to the participant’s demographics, academic qualifications, working hours was recorded. The CBI scale was utilized to assess the prevalence of burnout. The questionnaire consists of nineteen questions divided into three subdimensions. Six questions about personal burnout that assess exhaustion regardless of occupational factors, seven questions on work burnout that emphasizes on the exhaustion attributed to work-related factors and finally six questions related to tiredness due to interactions with an appropriate population, in our case it was “patients.” Each question has five answer choices, each assigned a numerical value. Scores are calculated individually in each subdomain and together to assess the prevalence of burnout. Scores of 50 to 74 are considered ‘moderate’, 75-99 are high, and a score of 100 is considered severe burnout. All items are straightforward, positively skewed, relate to the relevant subscale and have high internal reliability.17

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were analysed using SPSS-20.0. Frequency and percentage were calculated for the categorial variables and mean and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for continuous variables. Associations were studied using ANOVA test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to all resident doctors working in clinical departments of institute. Of these, 158 residents responded to the survey. Out of these 158 residents, 53.8% (85) were males and 46.2% (73) were females. The average age of respondents was 28 years. Distribution of study participants as per year of residency out of 158 residents, 37.34% (59) were 1st year residents, 34.81% (55) were 2nd year residents, while 27.85% (44) were 3rd year residents. Details about working hours per week was also taken. The 48.8% (77) residents work for 41-60 hours/week, 34.8% (55) residents work for 61-80 hours/week, 6.3% (10) residents work for <40 hours/week while 10.1% (16) residents work for >80 hours /week. 57.59% (91) residents have <2 years of experience in government hospital, 36.08 % (57) residents have 2-5 years of experience while 33% (10) have experience of >5 years in government hospital.

Table 2 shows about 39.24% (62) had the scores that indicate the total burnout. About 61.39% (97) residents showed the personal burnout, 43.03% (68) had work related burnout and 44.93% (71) had patient related burnout. About 24.1% residents experienced verbal or physical abuse by patients or their relatives.

Table 3 shows individual burnout domain mean scores with respect to year of residency. In our study it was found that personal burnout scores, work related burnout scores and personal burnout scores are comparatively higher in 1st year of residency as compared to 2nd and 3rd year of residency. The difference is statistically significant for work related burnout scores (p=0.012) and patient related burnout scores (p=0.013). While difference is not statistically significant for personal burnout scores (p=0.055).

Figure 1 depicts the gender distribution of residents for each domain of burnout scale. It is seen that number of female residents having burnout is more than that of male residents in all three domains of burnout.

Figure 1: Gender distribution of residents having burnout. | 47 31 35 50 37 39 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Personal Burnout Work related burnout Patient related burnout NUMBEROFRESIDENTS BURNOUT DOMAINS Male Female
Figure 1: Gender distribution of residents having burnout.
Table 1: Sociodemographic variables of study participants.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3
Table 2: Prevalence of burnout domains and total burnout among study participants.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3
Table 3: Distribution of mean scores for domains of CBI scale according to the year of residency.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

Table 4 shows association of burnout with respect to gender and year of residency. It shows that prevalence of overall burnout in females was 45.21% and males was 34.12%. But the difference is not statistically significant as p>0.05. For year of residency, prevalence of overall burnout in 1st year residents was 54.24% (32), in 2nd year residents was 32.73% (18) and in 3rd year residents was 27.27% (12). The difference is statistically significant as p<0.05.

Table 4: Association of overall burnout with sociodemographic variables of study participants.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

DISCUSSION

Burnout syndrome adversely affects both emotional and physical health of the doctors. It also affects their ability to treat patients effectively and empathically. Various scales such as Maslach burnout inventory (MBI), burnout clinical subtype questionnaire 12, and Oldenburg burnout inventory have been used to assess burnout among different professionals.18-20 We have used the CBI in our study which evaluates burnout in a number of dimensions. It is a self-explanatory, simple, comprehensive, and self-assessed questionnaire. Our results showed high scores in all three domains of CBI. 39.24% (62) study participants scored mean scores that indicates the burnout according to the CBI. Similar results were seen in study done by Divatia et al among ICU doctors in India in 2014 by using MBI scale. About 54% respondents had scored “moderate to high” on the emotional exhaustion scale and 40% scored “moderate to high” on the depersonalization scale.21

Among the three dimensions of burnout, highest incidence is seen for personal burnout. This shows that most of the residents were tired and either physically or emotionally exhausted. Similar results were seen by Langade et al on Indian doctors. In this study 65.98% people had high scores for the depersonalization scale and 45.02% participants had high scores for the emotional exhaustion scale on the Maslach burnout inventory.22 The results were also consistent with the studies carried out on oncologists in the USA.23 In our study, female residents had higher rates of burnout than their male colleagues. This result is also consistent with other studies carried out in India and internationally.22,24 This may be due to factors such as higher domestic expectations and responsibilities on the females in the society than their male counterparts.

In India, doctors to patient’s ratio is approximately 1:11,082 as per the National Health Profile 2018, while the ideal ratio is 1:1000 suggested by the WHO.25 The working hours and the workload among resident doctors working in government hospitals are very high. The doctors working in government hospitals in India also face other problems such as lack of appreciation, poor living conditions, unhealthy food habits, lack of insurance and protection, violence by patient’s relatives etc. This makes them vulnerable for lifestyle disorders such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, hyper lipidemia, and lack of energy to spend time with family and friends along with burnout syndrome. Burnout syndrome has been associated to psychological disorders and somatic symptoms including insomnia, irritability, chronic low mood and even suicidal tendencies.26 Though a sample size of 158 cannot be representative of the entire population of resident doctors working in government hospitals throughout the country, it provided us with an insight into the grave issue of physician burnout in the country.

Limitations

We had a few drawbacks to our study like, the data collection was restricted to doctors in one government hospital, and the sample size was small. We believe that the issues that doctors face around the country may be varied, but the issue of resident burnout is universal and hence must be given adequate attention.

CONCLUSION

Mainly, attention should be directed to identifying the symptoms of burnout syndrome and addressing them through strategies on various levels. More jobs must be created in public sector hospitals and number of seats for specialty training should also be increased. Stress management strategies such as meditation and psychological counselling should be made available to the residents. Finally, such training should be a part of orientation and recruitment process in government hospitals.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Author would like to thanks cooperation and participation of resident’s doctors in our study.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Malek M, Mohammadi S, Attarchi M. Occupational stress and influencing factors, in medical residents of one of the educational hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. RJMS. 2011;18(87):24-35.
  2. 2. Maslach C, Jackson S. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Occup Behav. 1981;2:99-113.
  3. 3. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1377-85.
  4. 4. Dyrbye LN, Massie FS Jr, Eacker A, Harper W, Power D, Durning SJ et al. Relationship between burnout and professional conduct and attitudes among US medical students. JAMA, 2010;304:1173-80.
  5. 5. Schneider KM, Monga M, Kerrigan AJ. Stress in residency: reality or myth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:907-9.
  6. 6. Collier VU, McCue JD, Markus A. Stress in medical residency: status quo after a decade of reform? Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:384-90.
  7. 7. Seward JP. Occupational stress. In: LaDou J, editor. Current occupational & environmental medicine. 4th ed. New York: MC Grow Hill. 2007;579-94.
  8. 8. Hurell JJ, Aristeguieta C. Occupational stress. In: Levy BS, Wegman DH, Sherry LB, Rosemary KS, editors. Occupational and environmental health. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006;382-96.
  9. 9. Butterfield PS. The stress of residency. A review of the literature. Arch Int Med. 1988;148(6):1428-35.
  10. 10. Chakraborti A, Ray P, Sanyal D, Thakurta RG, Bhattacharayya AK, Mallick AK et al. Assessing perceived stress in medical personnel: In search of an appropriate scale for the Bengali population. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35:29-33.
  11. 11. Iqbal S, Gupta S, Venkatarao E. Stress, anxiety and depression among medical undergraduate students and their socio-demographic correlates. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141:354-7.
  12. 12. Janjhua Y, Chandrakanta. Behavior of personality type toward stress and job performance: A study of healthcare professionals. J Family Med Prim Care. 2012;1:109-13.
  13. 13. Saini NK, Agrawal S, Bhasin SK, Bhatia MS, Sharma AK. Prevalence of stress among resident doctors working in Medical Colleges of Delhi. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54:219-23.
  14. 14. Supe AN. A study of stress in medical students at Seth G.S. Medical College. J Postgrad Med. 1998;44:1-6.
  15. 15. Menon V, Sarkar S, Kumar S. Barriers to healthcare seeking among medical students: A cross sectional study from South India. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91:477-82.
  16. 16. Seshadri S. Substance abuse among medical students and doctors: A call for action. Natl Med J India 2008;21:57-9.
  17. 17. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress. 2005;19:192-07.
  18. 18. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP, Schaufeli WB, Schwab RL. Maslach Burnout Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. 1986. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christina_ Maslach/publication/277816643_The_Maslach_Burn out_Inventory_Manual/links/5574dbd708aeb6d8 c01946d7.pdf. Accessed on 12 March, 2021.
  19. 19. Montero Marín J, Skapinakis P, Araya R, Gili M, García Campayo J. Towards a brief definition of burnout syndrome by subtypes: Development of the “Burnout clinical subtypes questionnaire” (BCSQ 12). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:74.
  20. 20. Demerouti E, Bakker AB. The Oldenburg burnout inventory: A good alternative to measure burnout and engagement. In: Handbook of Stress and Burnout in Health Care. New York: Nova Science Publishers. 2008;65-78.
  21. 21. Divatia JV. Burnout in the ICU: Playing with fire? Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:127-8.
  22. 22. Langade D, Modi PD, Sidhwa YF, Hishikar NA, Gharpure AS, Wankhade K et al. Burnout syndrome among medical practitioners across India: A questionnaire-based survey. Cureus. 2016;8:e771.
  23. 23. Shanafelt TD, Gradishar WJ, Kosty M, Satele D, Chew H, Horn L et al. Burnout and career satisfaction among US oncologists. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:678-86.
  24. 24. Embriaco N, Azoulay E, Barrau K, Kentish N, Pochard F, Loundou A et al. High level of burnout in intensivists: Prevalence and associated factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:686-92.
  25. 25. Doctor-population ratio: In India, one allopathic doctor for 11,082 people, official data shows; Bihar, UP worst hit. Available at: https://www.financialexpress.com/india news/doctor population ratio in India one allopathic doctorfor11082people official data shows Bihar up worst hit/1213243. Accessed on 12 March, 2021.
  26. 26. Rao R, Modi PD, Sidhwa YF, Hishikar NA, Langade D. Burnout among dental professionals in India: A questionnaire-based survey. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2016;10:16-25.