Original Research ArticleInternational Surgery Journal

Publication:
Comparison of operative procedures for re-leaks duodenal perforation: a cross-sectional analysis from a tertiary care hospital in a developing country

Int Surg J. 2016;3(3):1314-1317.DOI10.18203/2349-2902.isj20162230

Thumbnail Image
View on the journal's website(opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Background Re-leaks following surgical closure of duodenal perforations is a well known entity. Considering the paucity of data on patients with re-leak from Indian population, the present study was carried out.

Methods The present study is a prospective audit of patients diagnosed with duodenal re-leak and surgical procedures for arresting the leak was done. Hospital indoor case records were reviewed from 2005 to 2010. Following details were collected: demographic details (age and sex); presenting complaints; success of the surgical procedures to arrest re-leak and overall survival of patients. Conservative measures, 3 tubes method, jejunal patch, T tube duodenostomy and  rohondia’s cholecystoduodenoplasty were the type of procedures routinely performed for such patients. Descriptive statistics was used to represent various variables-mean (SD) for continuous and proportions (percentages) for categorical variables.

Results A total of 41 patients with duodenal re-leak requiring intervention were identified with mean (range) of age in years of 45 (25-65).The following types of procedures were carried out to arrest duodenal re-leaks: 3 tubes method (4/41, 9.8%), jejunal patch (7/41, 17.1%), T tube duodenostomy (1/41, 2.4%) and Rohondia’s cholecystoduodenoplasty (16/41, 39%) and conservative (13/41, 31.7%). A total of 75% (12/16) success in stopping the leak was observed with Rohondia’s cholecystoduodenoplasty followed by 1/4 (25%) with 3 tubes duodenostomy, one each with jejunal patch (14.3%) and conservative techniques (7.7%) and none with T- tube duodenostomy (P-0.1; not significant). A total of 32/41 (78%) patients died following the surgery for duodenal re-leak of which nearly four-fifths of them (26/32, 81%) died due to septicaemia, 5/33 (15.2%) had pulmonary complications and 1/33 (3%) due to perforation.

Conclusions To conclude, the present study gives baseline data on patients who have undergone various surgical procedures for arresting duodenal perforation but had re-leaks, in a tertiary care hospital of a developing country. The better outcomes associated with Rohondia’s cholecystoduodenoplasty was found in comparison to other surgical and conservative measures.

Keywords

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, H.B.T Medical College and Dr. R.N. Cooper Mun. General Hospital, Juhu, Mumbai
  2. Department of Surgery, MGM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai

Full item record