Evaluating the need for culturally sensitive communication training for doctors engaged in international medical tourism using the lens of communication accommodation theory

INTRODUCTION

International medical tourism has become a significant global industry, with patients traveling across borders to seek medical treatments that may be unavailable, unaffordable, or delayed in their home countries. Countries like India have emerged as key players in this industry, attracting a substantial number of medical tourists due to their advanced healthcare infrastructure, highly skilled medical professionals, and cost-effective treatment options. In 2019, India alone attracted nearly 697,453 medical tourists, generating approximately USD 6 billion in revenue.¹

However, while the quality of clinical care is undeniably crucial, the communication between healthcare providers and international patients is equally important. Effective communication is vital for ensuring positive health outcomes and patient satisfaction, especially in the context of cultural diversity. The Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), developed by Howard Giles, offers a valuable framework for understanding how doctors can adjust their communication styles to meet the cultural needs of their international patients.²

This study explores the application of CAT in the context of medical tourism, emphasizing the necessity of culturally sensitive communication training for healthcare providers. The research aims to demonstrate that by adopting communication strategies that accommodate the cultural preferences of international patients, healthcare providers can significantly enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes.

The rapid growth of the global medical tourism industry has brought significant attention to the dynamics of doctor-patient relationships, particularly in the context of cross-cultural interactions. Communication plays a critical role in bridging the cultural gap between healthcare providers and international patients, as it is not merely about the exchange of medical information but also about understanding and respecting the cultural nuances that influence how patients perceive and respond to care.³

In the context of medical tourism, communication styles can be broadly categorized into high-context and low-context cultures. High-context cultures, which are prevalent in many Asian and Middle Eastern societies, rely heavily on non-verbal cues, context, and indirect communication. Conversely, low-context cultures, common in Western countries, value direct, explicit communication and clear instructions.⁴

The implications of these communication styles are profound in medical tourism. For instance, a healthcare provider from a low-context culture may prioritize straightforward communication, expecting patients to appreciate clear and direct instructions. However, a patient from a high-context culture might perceive such directness as blunt or disrespectful, preferring instead a more nuanced approach that considers their unspoken concerns and the broader context of their situation.⁵ Failure to recognize and adapt to these differences can lead to misunderstandings, dissatisfaction, and even non-compliance with medical advice.

Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) offers a framework for understanding how healthcare providers can adjust their communication styles to align with the cultural expectations of their international patients. CAT posits that individuals modify their communication behaviours to either converge with or diverge from the communication style of their interlocutors, thereby influencing the quality of interpersonal interactions.⁶

In the context of medical tourism, CAT can be applied to understand how healthcare providers might adapt their verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to better align with the expectations of international patients. For example, a healthcare provider in India might use more formal language, reduce the use of medical jargon, or employ culturally relevant metaphors when interacting with patients from different linguistic or cultural backgrounds. These adjustments, or "accommodations," can help bridge communication gaps, making patients feel more understood and respected.⁷

Cultural sensitivity in healthcare communication is crucial for building trust and ensuring positive patient outcomes. Patients’ cultural and religious beliefs significantly shape their perceptions of medical treatment, particularly when they travel to foreign countries for healthcare. When patients perceive that their cultural beliefs are respected and integrated into their care, they are more likely to have positive treatment experiences and outcomes.⁸

Gender-based preferences in clinical examination practices are another area where cultural communication differences come into play. Many patients from conservative cultures, particularly in the Middle East and South Asia, may prefer to be examined by healthcare providers of the same gender due to religious or cultural reasons.⁹ In contrast, such preferences may be less pronounced in more liberal societies where gender roles are less strictly defined. When healthcare providers are sensitive to these preferences and communicate their willingness to accommodate them, it helps in building trust and ensuring that patients feel respected and comfortable.

The literature suggests that training in culturally sensitive communication is essential for healthcare providers in the medical tourism industry. Such training equips healthcare providers with the skills needed to adjust their communication styles in ways that respect and align with the cultural backgrounds of their patients.¹⁰ Programs grounded in CAT principles cover essential topics such as cultural awareness, sensitivity in clinical practices, and effective verbal and non-verbal communication strategies that are culturally adaptive.¹¹ Studies suggest that these training programs can significantly enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes within the medical tourism sector.¹²

Theoretical framework and hypotheses development

This study is grounded in Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), which posits that individuals adjust their communication behaviours to align with or differentiate from their interlocutors. The following hypotheses guide this study:

H1: There is a significant relationship between the use of high-context or low-context communication styles and patient satisfaction in the context of medical tourism in India.

H2: Cultural sensitivity in communication has a significant positive impact on patient experience in the context of medical tourism in India.

Conceptual model

The conceptual model for this study is based on CAT and focuses on the relationship between communication styles (high-context and low-context), cultural sensitivity, and patient satisfaction. The model proposes that healthcare providers' ability to adjust their communication styles to accommodate the cultural preferences of their patients will lead to higher levels of patient satisfaction and better health outcomes.

This study adopted a post-positivist research approach with a convenience sampling technique to select participants for this cross-sectional study.¹³ This non-probabilistic method was chosen for its practicality and efficiency, enabling access to a diverse population of international patients at the selected healthcare institution.

The final sample size was 1,476 patients, which was deemed adequate to provide a comprehensive understanding of the communication styles between doctors and international patients in the context of medical tourism.

METHODS

Research design

This study adopted a post-positivist research approach with a convenience sampling technique to select participants for this cross-sectional study. This non-probabilistic method was chosen for its practicality and efficiency, enabling access to a diverse population of international patients at the selected healthcare institution. The final sample size was 1,476 patients. This sample size was deemed adequate to provide a comprehensive understanding of the communication styles between doctors and international patients in the context of medical tourism.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria included patients willing to participate in the study and patients willing to undergo treatment at the selected hospital.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria included patients not willing to undergo treatment or patients unwilling to participate in the study.

Data collection

Data were collected using a detailed questionnaire specifically designed to capture the nuances of cross-cultural communication between doctors and patients. The questionnaire was meticulously developed with input from language translators to ensure that all patients, regardless of their native language, could accurately comprehend and respond to the questions.

To facilitate a detailed assessment, the questionnaire utilized a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, which allowed for a nuanced evaluation of patient perceptions and experiences.

Data collection was conducted between April 2022 and November 2023 at AHI and Hospital, a multi-speciality hospital approved by the Government of India, NABH, and JCI. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the appropriate institutional ethics committee prior to commencement.

Data analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSSv24, Smart PLS 3, and MGA-PLS. These tools were selected for their capability to manage complex models and provide in-depth insights into the relationships between various variables. The analysis focused on the responses to the questionnaire, identifying patterns and testing hypotheses related to cross-cultural communication and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship.

RESULTS

The findings from the data analysis supported the hypotheses proposed in the theoretical framework. Specifically, the analysis identified a strong positive correlation (path coefficient = 0.809) between patient expectations and experiences. This implies that patients who had greater confidence in their interactions with culturally competent doctors reported more satisfying overall experiences.

The mediation analysis further indicated that international patient expectations played a significant mediating role in the relationship between self-efficacy and patient experiences. This suggests that patients' expectations are instrumental in shaping their overall experiences, alongside their levels of self-efficacy.

Descriptive statistics, including mean, median, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis, fell within acceptable limits. This indicates that the data followed a normal distribution. Additionally, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed for each construct using the principal components analysis approach.

The construct, 'MT patient ICC beliefs about Indian MT hospitals,' identified three dimensions: ICC beliefs concerning country and culture, ICC beliefs about cultural accommodation provided by the hospital staff, and cognitive ICC beliefs associated with treatment offered at the hospital.

The mediation analysis conducted in our study revealed that international patient expectations partially influence the connection between patient beliefs and their experiences. Consequently, boosting patient confidence as a strategic approach could enhance the intercultural competencies of Indian doctors. This, in turn, would not only enrich patient experiences but also indirectly elevate outcomes by raising patient expectations. Patients with greater self-confidence are more likely to set higher expectations, which, when fulfilled or surpassed, contribute to an improved overall experience.

The linear regression model (LM) provides prediction errors and summary statistics without considering the specified PLS path model. Instead, the LM method predicts outcomes by regressing all exogenous indicator variables onto each endogenous indicator variable. As a result, comparing the LM approach with PLS-SEM results helps evaluate whether employing a theoretically defined path model enhances (or at least does not degrade) predictive accuracy based on the given indicator data. Compared to LM outcomes, PLS-SEM results are expected to exhibit lower prediction errors, such as those measured by RMSE or MAE.

It is important to note that LM prediction errors are limited to observable variables and do not account for latent variables.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study underscore the pivotal role of effective communication in shaping the experiences of international medical patients, particularly in the context of medical tourism in India.¹⁴ The strong relationship between self-efficacy and patient experience indicates that culturally competent communication significantly enhances patient outcomes.¹⁵

The application of CAT in this study provides a robust framework for understanding how healthcare providers can improve communication with international patients.¹⁶ CAT posits that individuals adjust their communication behaviours either converging towards or diverging from the communication style of their interlocutors to facilitate understanding, build rapport, and achieve communicative goals.¹⁷

Cultural sensitivity is not only about understanding the verbal language used by patients but also about recognizing and respecting non-verbal communication cues that vary widely across cultures.¹⁸

The successful application of CAT in improving doctor-patient communication has significant implications for the Indian medical tourism industry.¹⁹ By fostering culturally competent communication, Indian healthcare providers can enhance the overall patient experience, leading to higher levels of patient satisfaction and loyalty.²⁰

This study highlights the critical role of effective doctor-patient communication in enhancing the experiences of international medical tourists in India, with a particular focus on the application of Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT).²¹ The findings underscore the importance of cultural sensitivity and adaptive communication strategies in fostering positive healthcare outcomes for patients from diverse cultural backgrounds.²²

The implementation of comprehensive cross-cultural training programs is essential for equipping Indian healthcare providers with the skills needed to navigate the complexities of doctor-patient communication in a globalized healthcare environment.²³

While this study provides valuable insights into the role of Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) in enhancing doctor-patient communication within the Indian medical tourism industry, several limitations should be acknowledged.²⁴

First, the study's reliance on self-reported data from patients may introduce biases, as responses could be influenced by patients' perceptions, cultural backgrounds, or their experiences at the time of the survey.²⁵

Future research should address these limitations by incorporating longitudinal designs that track patient experiences over time to assess the durability of communication improvements and their long-term effects on patient satisfaction and health outcomes.²⁶

The successful application of Communication Accommodation Theory offers a valuable framework for improving doctor-patient communication in the context of international medical tourism.²⁷ By understanding and adapting to the cultural and communicative preferences of international patients, healthcare providers can significantly enhance patient experiences, leading to better healthcare outcomes and increased patient satisfaction.²⁸

Based on the study's findings, several recommendations can be made to improve doctor-patient communication in the context of international medical tourism.

Comprehensive Cross-Cultural Communication Training: Healthcare providers should undergo comprehensive cross-cultural communication training that incorporates the principles of CAT. These programs should educate doctors on the cultural norms, values, and communication styles of the diverse international patient populations they serve.²⁹

Flexible Communication Strategies: Doctors should be trained to adopt flexible communication strategies that can be adjusted based on the cultural context of the patient.³⁰ This includes recognizing when to use convergent communication where the doctor adapts their style to align with the patient’s cultural norms and when to use divergent communication to maintain professional boundaries or assert medical authority.³¹

Non-Verbal Communication Training: Non-verbal communication is a significant aspect of cross-cultural interactions.³² Indian healthcare providers should be trained to interpret and utilize non-verbal cues, such as eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, and body language, in ways that are culturally sensitive.³³

Patient-Centred Approaches: Emphasize patient-centred communication approaches that prioritize the needs, preferences, and cultural backgrounds of international patients.³⁴ This involves actively listening to patients, acknowledging their cultural beliefs and values, and incorporating these into the medical decision-making process.³⁵

Gender Sensitivity Training: Doctors should be mindful of cultural sensitivities during medical examinations, particularly regarding gender norms and modesty.³⁶ For instance, in cultures where female patients may prefer to be examined by female doctors, healthcare facilities should ensure that such options are available.³⁷

Tailoring Communication Styles: In low-context cultures, where explicit and direct communication is valued, doctors should focus on providing clear, detailed, and straightforward explanations about medical conditions and treatment plans. Conversely, doctors should adopt more indirect and contextual approaches for patients from high-context cultures.

Cultural Integration in Care Plans: Healthcare providers should make a concerted effort to incorporate patients’ cultural preferences into their care plans. This can include accommodating dietary restrictions, respecting prayer times, and considering family involvement in medical decisions, particularly for patients from collectivist cultures.

Ongoing Professional Development Programs: Establish ongoing professional development programs that reinforce the importance of cultural competence and communication accommodation. These programs should be regularly updated to reflect the latest best practices and emerging trends in international patient care.

While this study provides valuable insights into doctor-patient communication in medical tourism, it has certain limitations like self-reported data bias: The study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to response biases influenced by personal perceptions or recent experiences. Secondly, Single Institutional Context: The study was conducted at a single healthcare institution in Delhi, which may limit its generalizability to other institutions or regions in India. Thirdly, Cross-Sectional Design: The cross-sectional nature of the study does not account for changes in communication effectiveness over time, nor does it evaluate long-term impacts on patient satisfaction and adherence.

Future research directions should include to conduct longitudinal studies to track communication improvements and patient satisfaction over time. Also, we should expand the study to include multiple healthcare institutions across different regions in India for broader generalizability. In addition, one should focus on assessing the specific components of cross-cultural training that are most effective in improving communication and patient satisfaction. Lastly, incorporate technological interventions such as Virtual Reality (VR) simulations to train healthcare providers in cultural competence.³⁸

The successful application of Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) provides a powerful framework for improving doctor-patient communication in the context of international medical tourism.³⁹ By understanding and adapting to the cultural and communicative preferences of international patients, healthcare providers can significantly enhance patient experiences, leading to better healthcare outcomes and increased satisfaction.⁴⁰

The findings of this study emphasize the need for culturally sensitive communication strategies and training programs to equip doctors with the skills required to navigate diverse cultural interactions effectively.

As India continues to grow as a hub for medical tourism, sustained investments in cultural competence training and communication technologies will be critical for maintaining high standards of patient care. These efforts will not only improve patient satisfaction but also strengthen India’s position as a global leader in the medical tourism industry.⁴¹

CONCLUSION

The findings underscore the critical need for culturally sensitive communication training for doctors involved in international medical tourism. By adopting communication strategies that accommodate the cultural preferences of international patients, healthcare providers can significantly improve patient satisfaction and outcomes, thereby enhancing the global competitiveness of medical tourism destinations like India.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee

REFERENCES

1. 1. Government of India. Ministry of Tourism, Government of India. India tourism statistics at a glance, 2019. Available at: https://tourism.gov.in/sites/default/files/2020-04/India%20Tourism%20Statistics%20at%20a%20Glance%202019.pdf. Accessed 01 May 2024.
2. 2. Giles H, editor. Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press; 2016.
3. 3. Ali, S. H., Yu, Z., & Hussain, M. (2017). Cross-cultural communication in healthcare: Understanding the impact of cultural differences. *Journal of Health Communication*, 22(6), 540-548.
4. 4. Beach MC, Price EG, Gary TL, Robinson KA, Gozu A, Palacio A, et al. Cultural competence: a systematic review of health care provider educational interventions. Medi Care. 2005;43(4):356-73.
5. 5. Betancourt J, Green A, Carillo JE. The challenges of cross-cultural healthcare-diversity, ethics, and the medical encounter. Bioethics Forum. 2000;16(3):27-32.
6. 6. Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Owusu Ananeh-Firempong II. Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public health reports. 2003;118(4):293-302.
7. 7. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2016.
8. 8. Gasiorek J, Giles H. Communication accommodation theory. In: Berger CR, Roloff ME (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication; 2015:1-10.
9. 9. Giles H, Ogay T. Communication accommodation theory. In: Whaley BB, Samter W (Eds.). Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007:293-310.
10. 10. Goel, S., & Goel, S. (2020). The impact of cross-cultural communication on patient satisfaction in medical tourism. *Journal of Health Communication*, 25(2), 100-110.
11. 11. Gudykunst WB, Kim YY. Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
12. 12. Gupta, V., & Das, P. (2018). The role of cultural sensitivity in enhancing patient experience in Indian hospitals. *Journal of Health Management*, 20(3), 307-323.
13. 13. Hall ET. Beyond culture. Anchor Books; 2016.
14. 14. Hasnain, M., Connell, K. J., Menon, U., & Tranmer, P. A. (2017). Patient-provider communication: A cultural sensitivity perspective. *International Journal of Healthcare Management*, 10(3), 223-230.
15. 15. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd ed. Guilford Press; 2017.
16. 16. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58(1):593-614.
17. 17. Mittal, A., Mohanty, M., & Sharma, A. (2019). Medical tourism in India: Prospects and challenges. *International Journal of Health Services*, 49(4), 707-721.
18. 18. Mukherjee, S. (2017). v. *International Journal of Health Services*, 47(1), 164-178.
19. 19. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. 8th ed. Muthén & Muthén; 2017.
20. 20. Pachisia K, Sood A. Medical tourism in India: Opportunities and challenges. J Medi Market. 2017;17(1):34-42.
21. 21. Nwoye A. African cultural values: The past, present, and future. J Black Stud. 2015;46(3):263-82.
22. 22. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Res Meth. 2008;40(3):879-91.
23. 23. Purnell, L. D. (2018). *Guide to culturally competent health care*. FA Davis.
24. 24. Saha S, Beach MC, Cooper LA. Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality. J Nat Medi Associat. 2008;100(11):1275-85.
25. 25. Sharma A, Jindal H. Government initiatives in promoting medical tourism in India. J Health Pol Manag. 2019;14(3):239-47.
26. 26. Singh P, Singh N. Enhancing service quality through cultural competence training in medical tourism: The case of Delhi. Tourism Management Perspect. 2019;30:108-16.
27. 27. Smith RD, Chanda R, Tangcharoensathien V. Trade in health-related services. The Lancet. 2009;373(9663):593-601.
28. 28. Soliz J, Giles H. Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of communication accommodation theory. Communication yearbook. 2014;38(1):107-43.
29. 29. Liu IC, Chen CC. Cultural issues in medical tourism. Ame J Tour Res. 2013;2(1):78-83.
30. 30. Turner L. Medical tourism and communication. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press; 2017.
31. 31. Shirazi M, Ponzer S, Zarghi N, Keshmiri F, Motlagh MK, Zavareh DK, Khankeh HR. Inter-cultural and cross-cultural communication through physicians’ lens: perceptions and experiences. Int J Medi Educat. 2020;11:158.
32. 32. Purnell L. Cross cultural communication: Verbal and non-verbal communication, interpretation and translation. Global applications of culturally competent health care: Guidelines for practice. 2018:131-42.
33. 33. Schouten BC, Meeuwesen L. Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature. Patient Educat Counsel. 2006;64(1-3):21-34.
34. 34. Pérez-Stable EJ, Gany FM. Navigating language and cultural barriers in medical tourism. Medical Tourism Magazine. 2019;15.
35. 35. Like RC, Barrett TJ, Moon J. Educating physicians to provide culturally competent, patient-centered care. Perspect. 2008;7(2):10-20.
36. 36. Caligiuri P, Tarique I. Cultural agility and international assignees’ effectiveness in cross‐cultural interactions. Int J Train Develop. 2016;20(4):280-9.
37. 37. Kaihlanen AM, Hietapakka L, Heponiemi T. Increasing cultural awareness: qualitative study of nurses’ perceptions about cultural competence training. BMC Nur. 2019;18:1-9.
38. 38. Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE. Cultural competence in health care: Emerging frameworks and practical approaches. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund, Quality of Care for Underserved Populations; 2002:1-32.
39. 39. Garcia EA, Roy LC. Using interpreters for the non-English-speaking patient: A guide for emergency nurses. J Emerg Nurs. 2004;30(3):237-43.
40. 40. Raddawi R. Language and identity in the United Arab Emirates: The role of English. Int J Lang Translat Intercul Communi. 2006;1(1):33-44.
41. 41. Flores G, Laws MB, Mayo SJ, Zuckerman B, Abreu M, Medina L, et al. Errors in medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences in pediatric encounters. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):6-14.