Lichen planus like keratosis: little known and misleading etiology of pigmented skin lesion
1Department of Dermatology-Venereology, 2Department of Anatomopathology, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
Received: 30 March 2023
Accepted: 16 June 2023
*Correspondence:
Dr. Marwa Asermouh,
E-mail: marwasermouh@gmail.com
Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Benign lichenoid keratosis is a rarely described entity in the literature. It is believed to correspond to a process of clearance of a solar lentigo or a seborrheic keratosis that must be confirmed on histology. The clinical and dermoscopic presentations are very variable from one subject to another and according to the stage of progression. In our case, its localization on the umbilicus with a grayish-black clinical aspect and a doubtful dermoscopy is not only original, but led us to wrongly think of a malignant tumor and to perform an anatomopathological examination that helped to re-establish the diagnosis.
Keywords: Lichen planus like keratosis, Lichenoid benign keratosis, Umbilicus, Dermoscopy, Dermatopathology, Black skin tumor
INTRODUCTION
A pigmented skin lesion may be due to either benign or malignant proliferation of melanocytic cells or to the presence of a deposit of melanin, coagulated blood or oxidized keratin in a non-melanocytic lesion. Malignant tumors and more particularly melanoma remain the greatest fear and must be ruled out with the help of dermoscopy. Unfortunately, sometimes it can be misleading, and make us think wrongly of a malignant pathology as in our case.
CASE REPORT
A 30-year-old patient, with no medical history, consults for a hyperpigmented umbilical lesion that has been evolving for 9 months, totally asymptomatic and without any other associated symptoms. Clinical examination revealed a patient of skin phototype IV, a nodular lesion of heterogeneous greyish-brown color, scaly, not well bordered, measuring approximately 1 cm of large axis, located on the umbilicus and two small satellite lesions slightly infiltrated and somewhat hyperpigmented (Figure 1). Dermoscopy showed several blue-gray fine dots and globules, a keratinized center with a gray-blue pseudo-veil (Figure 2).
A skin biopsy was immediately performed with an anatomopathological study demonstrating a papillomatous acanthosic epidermis overlaid by a very thick keratin layer. In the superficial dermis, there is a mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate arranged in a band that nibbles at the basal lamina with numerous apoptotic bodies. Pigmentary incontinence, spongiosis and corneal cysts are also seen (Figure 3).
The diagnosis of lichen planus like keratosis (LPLK) was retained. A therapeutic abstention was decided and an appointment for control was given.
DISCUSSION
LPLK also known as benign lichenoid keratosis, is a common benign lesion that is of great relevance when it is mistakenly diagnosed as a malignant lesion such as basal cell carcinoma or melanoma.1 It is believed to be an inflammatory process intended to clear residual seborrheic keratosis or solar lentigo that often disappears spontaneously within 3 to 18 months.2,3 To support this diagnosis, evidence of the initial lesion disappearing is required, including the presence of remnant histological features in favor of seborrheic keratosis or solar lentigo.4,5
In a recent study, Ansari et al described different clinical presentations. The pigmented macular form was the most frequently found.6 Dermoscopically, several patterns can be seen. In the pigmented forms, stereotypical dermoscopic findings are brown-grayish granules which may cluster and form globules, rhomboidal structures or stripes. A remaining part of the preexisting seborrheic keratosis can also be found guiding then the diagnosis.7 However, Watanabe et al reportedly identified dermoscopic changes according to lesion chronology in a small-sized study of 17 LPLK. Initially there would be a light brown pseudo-network due in particular to the residual primary lesion, as well as overlapping pinkish areas explained by lichenoid inflammation. During the regression phase, annular granular structures and gray pseudo-network seemed to be main dermoscopic features; Finally, during the late regression stage, diffuse fine gray-blue dots are observed.8 Some of these dermoscopic patterns may be misleading, which justifies a biopsy with a histological study for any suspicious lesion.
The lesion is most often found on the face, trunk or limbs.6 To our knowledge, lichenoid keratosis of the umbilicus has not been described previously and is therefore an exceptional location. The umbilicus is a complex anatomical structure, that can be the elective site of inflammatory and infectious dermatoses as well as tumors or malformations. There are various etiologies of a hyperpigmented umbilical lesion. In adults, sister Mary Joseph's nodule is the first diagnosis discussed and feared. These skin metastasis with a poor prognosis are most often secondary to gastric adenocarcinoma in men and ovarian cancer in women. Clinically, the sister Mary Joseph nodule is firm, irregular, blue-purple or brownish-red and may ulcerate subsequently.9 Melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma may also be suspected, especially when dermoscopy is favorable. Benign tumors, including omphaloliths, seborrheic keratoses, dermal nevi, hypertrophic and keloid scars, dermatofibromas, epidermal cysts and warts, should also be considered in adults; while botriomycoma is to be considered first in the pediatric population.10
CONCLUSION
LPLK is a diagnosis that should be considered in the presence of a pigmented lesion. However, given the great variability of the clinical and dermoscopic presentations, which are sometimes confusing, a histological study must be performed to rule out a malignant lesion.
Funding: No funding sources
Conflict of interest: None declared
Ethical approval: Not required
REFERENCES
- 1. Pogorzelska-Antkowiak A. Lichen planus-like keratosis: what do we know about it? Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(11):1923-7.
- 2. Ito H, Ishizaki S, Oryu F. Two cases of lichen planus-like keratosis. Rinsho Derma (Tokyo). 1994;36:513-6.
- 3. Mobini N. In: Elder D, ed. Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Wilkins. 2009:364.
- 4. Mehregan AH. Lentigo senilis and its evolutions. J Invest Dermatol. 1975;65:429-33.
- 5. Laur WE, Posey RE, Waller JD. Lichen planus-like keratosis. A clinicohistopathologic correlation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;4:329-36.
- 6. Ansari MS, Bengu Nisa Akay BN, Cengiz FP, Rosendahl N, Mahmoudi H, Daneshpazhooh M et al. Clinical and dermatoscopic characteristics of lichen planus-like keratosis in a West-Asian population. Austral J Dermatol. 2020;1.
- 7. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Moscarella E. Extensive regression in pigmented skin lesions: a dangerous confounding feature. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2012;2:202a08.
- 8. Watanabe S, Sawada M, Dekio I, Ishizaki S, Fujibayashi M, Tanaka M. Chronology of lichen planus-like keratosis features by dermoscopy: a summary of 17 cases. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2016;6(2):6
- 9. Das A. Umbilical lesions: a cluster of known unknowns and unknown unknowns. Cureus. 2019;11e5309.
- 10. Bounouar M, Hatimi A, Meziane M. Omphalolith: a bewildering presentation. French Pan Afr Med J. 2011;8:37.