Original Research Article
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243904
Clinico-radiological assessment of vascularized muscle pedicle bone graft in scaphoid non-union
1Department of Orthopaedics, G.S.V.M Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Uma Sanjeevani Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India
Received: 11 October 2024
Revised: 07 December 2024
Accepted: 19 December 2024
*Correspondence:
Dr. Rachit Bhatnagar,
E-mail: princerachit@gmail.com
Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the clinico-radiological outcome of vascularised muscle pedicle bone graft in scaphoid non-union.
Methods: 16 men and 8 women with non-union of the scaphoid involving the proximal pole (n=6), waist (n=14), and distal pole (n=4) were randomly assigned to receive a vascularized muscle pedicle bone transplant with Herbert screw fixation. Their ages ranged from 18 to 45 (mean 32). Eight months was the average non-union period (range: 4–12 months).
Results: The mean follow-up duration was 18 months. 20 out of 24 were united. In 16 out of 24 cases, the scapholunate and radiolunate angles were corrected. 4 of 24 did not achieve union, and 3 of those were associated with proximal pole absorption. During pedicle dissection, there was no iatrogenic fracture or hardware malfunction.
Conclusions: Scaphoid non-union has been successfully treated with vascularized bone grafts, particularly in cases where the non-union has an avascular proximal pole or has not healed following prior surgery.
Keywords: Scaphoid non-union, Avascular proximal pole, Muscle pedicle bone graft
INTRODUCTION
Almost 10% of scaphoid fractures that are treated non-operatively may not heal, leading to carpal collapse and ultimately radiocarpal osteoarthritis.1-3 Success rates for surgical fixations for scaphoid non-union range from 70 to 90%.4,5 A 90% success rate can be achieved with Russe inlay bone grafting or iliac crest bone grafting with screw fixation.6 Because of impaired vascularity, non-union is more likely in proximal pole fractures. Conventional bone grafting may not work in cases where the fracture site is entirely avascular, exhibits necrotic bone, and shows no signs of bleeding.4,5,7,8
The non-union site may get a source of angiogenic and osteogenic factors from vascularized bone grafts.6,7 Vascularized pedicled bone grafts have been utilized to treat non-union of the scaphoid, pronator quadratus, and anterior side of the wrist and forearm.9-11 Additional salvage operations consist of posterior and anterior interosseous neurectomy or radial styloidectomy along with partial scaphoid excision. Limited intercarpal fusion, proximal row carpectomy, scaphoid excision and 4-corner fusion, and whole wrist fusion are among the more intricate treatments.12
METHODS
In a sample of 24 cases of non-union scaphoid between 2022 and 2024, 16 of the cases involved men and 8 involved women, ages 18 to 45 (mean 32 years), with non-union of the scaphoid involving the proximal pole (n=6), waist (n=14), and distal pole (n=4). A vascularized muscle pedicle bone graft with Herbert screw fixation was randomly assigned to them. Informed consent of each patient was obtained. The mean duration of non-union was 8 months (4-12 months). There was a reduction in mean range of motion. Dorsiflexion and radial deviation were the most impacted motions. Radiographs in lateral, antero-posterior, and 300 ulnar-deviation were obtained. The scapholunate angle, radiolunate angle, and intrascaphoid angle were measured.
Technique
To reveal the non-union, a volar incision was given over the scaphoid tuberosity and the distal radius (Figure 1). The radio-scapho-capitate ligament complex was split, although it was kept for potential future restoration of the muscle pedicle. Using a power burr, the ends of the sclerotic bone were freshened to create an oval cavity that was 10 to 20 mm long and parallel to the scaphoid axis. After identifying the pronator quadratus, a block of bone graft measuring 15 to 20 mm long was formed at the graft's distal insertion on the distal radius, near the abductor pollicis longus tendon. Kirschner wire holes were delineated around the graft's perimeter to aid in separation using a fine osteotome. To ensure a 20 mm thick pedicle, the pronator quadratus muscle was dissected toward the ulna with caution to avoid severing it from the obtained bone graft. The ulnar origin of the pronator quadratus was freed subperiosteally from the ulna through an extra incision over the distal ulna if the muscle was too tight to permit easy transfer of the pedicled bone. With the thumb under traction, the proximal and distal scaphoid segments were meticulously positioned. By using this technique, any intercalated segment instability is fixed and the grafted bone can be carefully placed into the scaphoid cavity (Figure 2). A Herbert's screw was inserted at the scaphoid tuberosity to secure the graft and the proximal and distal scaphoid segments, avoiding the radiocarpal joint (Figure 3). A long-arm thumb spica cast was placed after the skin closure.
Postoperative care
After one month, the long arm thumb spica cast is removed and replaced with a short arm cast for an additional month. Radiographs and, if in question, tomograms are used to assess the union after two months. After another month or two of bracing the wrist in a functioning position, physical activities are started.
RESULTS
Table 1 presents the demographic data, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of the study participants. The mean age of the participants was 29.46±6.95 years, and the average duration of non-union was 9.67±3.38 months. Regarding fracture site distribution, the majority of fractures occurred in the waist (58.33%), followed by the proximal pole (25.00%) and distal pole (16.67%). These findings provide an overview of the participant characteristics and fracture patterns in the study cohort.
Table 2 compares the pre-operative and post-operative findings of scaphoid non-union. Significant improvements were observed in all range of motion parameters following surgery. Dorsiflexion increased from 49.83±4.48° pre-operatively to 59.42±4.41° post-operatively (p<0.001). Palmar flexion improved from 53.04±3.44° to 57.13±3.14° (p<0.001), radial deviation increased from 9.71±1.52° to 14.21±1.53° (p<0.001), and ulnar deviation improved from 23.17±2.60° to 28.17±2.06° (p<0.001). All changes were statistically significant, indicating positive outcomes following surgical intervention.
Table 3 presents the comparison of the percentage change in different range of movements following surgery. Significant improvements were observed in all movement parameters, with dorsiflexion showing an average change of 18.88±3.28% (p<0.001). Palmar flexion increased by 7.82±3.67% (p<0.001), radial deviation showed a substantial change of 48.06±16.39% (p<0.001), and ulnar deviation improved by 21.32±8.74% (p<0.001). All changes were statistically significant, indicating considerable functional improvement post-operatively.
The follow-up period was 18 months on average. Union was achieved in 20 of 24 cases. Correction of the scapholunate and radiolunate angles was attained in 16 out of 24 cases (union). The scapholunate and radiolunate angles were not fully corrected in 8 of 24 cases (union). 4 of 24 cases landed in non-union, 3 of those were associated with proximal pole absorption. During pedicle dissection there was no iatrogenic fracture or hardware malfunction.
The average ROM of the wrist improved after operation. Dorsiflexion increased from 50 degrees to 59.4 degrees, planter-flexion from 55 degrees to 62 degrees, radial deviation from 9.3 degrees to 14 degrees and ulnar deviation marginally improved from 25 to 28 degrees after surgery. If average percentage of increase in range of motion after surgery is taken into consideration, dorsiflexion was increased by 19%, palmar flexion was increased by 7.8%, radial deviation was increased by 48% and ulnar deviation was increased by 21.3%.
Table 4 shows the distribution of union status across different fracture sites. The total number of fractures was 24, with fractures in the distal pole (4), proximal pole (6), and waist (14). Union status was categorized as "not united," "not united with proximal pole absorption," "united with anatomical restoration," and "united without anatomical restoration." For the distal pole, 2 fractures were united with anatomical restoration, and 2 were united without anatomical restoration. In the proximal pole group, 3 fractures were not united with proximal pole absorption, and 1 was united with anatomical restoration. The waist group had the highest number of fractures, with 9 united with anatomical restoration, and 4 united without anatomical restoration. The p value of 0.04 suggests a statistically significant association between union status and fracture site.
P value=0.04
DISCUSSION
Vascularized bone grafting (VBG) is indicated for proximal pole non-union and AVN of the proximal pole. Both the presence of AVN on MRI and the lack of punctate bleeding sites from the proximal pole after surgery are indicators of AVN.
It is difficult to place the Herbert screw accurately with a free-hand technique; implant malposition may be avoided by bending the wrist and using the thumb's axis as a guide. All non-union cases in an early Herbert screw fixation were unable to achieve union without bone grafting.13 However, the position of the guidewire cannot be confirmed by fluoroscopic means because of the bent wrist. By combining bone transplantation with Herbert-screw fixation, 25 of the 26 patients with scaphoid non-union were able to achieve union. The follow-up period was short, nevertheless, and trabeculation above the fracture line was identified as union on two of the four radiographs.14
After an average follow-up of 14 months, the mean palmar flexion, dorsiflexion, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation of 33 scaphoid non-union patients treated with Herbert screws, bone grafting, or both were 8º, 61º, 20º, and 35º, respectively, and the grip strength was the same as the uninjured hand.15
One safe and effective treatment for symptomatic nonunion of the scaphoid is the Russe inlay bone grafting operation.16 The volar technique helps to rectify any flexion deformity and reduces harm to the blood supply.
Russe in 1960 reported union rates to be 20/22.16 Jiranek et al, Stark et al and Cooney et al revealed union in 21 out of 26 (in 7 to 18 years), 147 out of 151 (in one to 10 years), and 38 out of 44 (in 12 to 163 months) respectively.17-19
Vascularized bone grafts can maintain the carpus's natural structure, maximizing anatomic motion and lowering the chance of collapse and degenerative change. There is very little morbidity because the grafts can be acquired with just one incision. The volar carpal artery begins its journey along the volar aspect of the radius at the level of the radial styloid, branches off from the radial artery at the distal edge of the pronator quadratus, and culminates in a T-shaped anastomosis. During dissection, this branch's location is constant and noticeable. In our study we studied the outcome of vascularized pedicle bone graft on non-union scaphoid fracture in 24 patients. The average mean follow-up was 18 months. We found that majority of patients achieved union with or without anatomical restoration. This suggests that the treatment protocols are generally effective in promoting bone healing. Of those which achieved union majority were waist type fractures. Some patients have not achieved union, particularly those with fractures at the proximal pole or where proximal pole absorption is noted. This may indicate challenges in treatment efficacy for specific fracture types. Overall, there is a notable improvement in range of motion post-operatively across all measured parameters (dorsiflexion, palmar flexion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation). This indicates that despite the challenges in union for some patients, the surgical interventions have generally been successful in restoring functional mobility of the wrist.
The limitation of this study is that it lacks detailed information on the specific surgical techniques used, patient comorbidities, or complications, which could further influence outcomes.
So, in brief the outcomes suggest that this surgical intervention is generally effective in promoting fracture healing and improving wrist function. Fractures located at the waist of the scaphoid generally have better outcomes compared to those at the proximal pole or with proximal pole absorption, which may require more tailored treatment approaches. While age and duration of non-union are noted, their specific impact on outcomes would require further statistical analysis to determine correlations with union and functional outcomes.
CONCLUSION
A combination of Herbert screw fixation and bone graft always produces superior results than either technique alone. To further enhance vascularity in handling such a complex scenario, vascularized muscle pedicle bone graft might be added. Overall, there is a notable 85% union rate and a significant improvement in range of motion.
Funding: No funding sources
Conflict of interest: None declared
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee
REFERENCES
- 1. Rajagopalan BM, Squire DS, Samuels LO. Results of Herbert-screw fixation with bone-grafting for the treatment of nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:48-52.
- 2. Lindstrom G, Nystrom A. Natural history of scaphoid non-union, with special reference to “asymptomatic” cases. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17:697-700.
- 3. Dias JJ, Brenkel IJ, Finlay DB. Patterns of union in fractures of the waist of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:307-10.
- 4. Filan SL, Herbert TJ. Herbert screw fixation of scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:519-29.
- 5. Robbins RR, Ridge O, Carter PR. Iliac crest bone grafting and Herbert screw fixation of nonunions of the scaphoid with avascular proximal poles. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20:818-31.
- 6. Zaidemberg C, Siebert JW, Angrigiani C. A new vascularized bone graft for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16:474-8.
- 7. Sunagawa T, Bishop AT, Muramatsu K. Role of conventional and vascularized bone grafts in scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis: a canine experimental study. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:849-59.
- 8. Green DP. The effect of avascular necrosis on Russe bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10:597-605.
- 9. Braun RM. Pronator pedicle bone grafting in the forearm and proximal carpal row. Orthop Trans. 1983;7:35.
- 10. Chacha PB. Vascularised pedicular bone grafts. Int Orthop. 1984;8:117-38.
- 11. Kawai H, Yamamoto K. Pronator quadratus pedicled bone graft for old scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:829-31.
- 12. Herbert TJ. The fractured scaphoid. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing. 1990;31-3.
- 13. Herbert TJ, Fisher WE. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:114-23.
- 14. Daly K, Gill P, Magnussen PA, Simonis RB. Established nonunion of the scaphoid treated by volar wedge grafting and Herbert screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:530-4.
- 15. Bunker TD, McNamee PB, Scott TD. The Herbert screw for scaphoid fractures. A multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:631-4.
- 16. Russe O. Fracture of the carpal navicular. Diagnosis, non-operative treatment, and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:759-68.
- 17. Jiranek WA, Ruby LK, Millender LB, Bankoff MS, Newberg AH. Long-term results after Russe bone-grafting: the effect of malunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1217-28.
- 18. Stark HH, Rickard TA, Zemel NP, Ashworth CR. Treatment of ununited fractures of the scaphoid by iliac bone grafts and Kirschner-wire fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:982-91.
- 19. Cooney WP 3rd, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Nonunion of the scaphoid: analysis of the results from bone grafting. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5:343-54.