International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health

Jha T et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Aug;8(8):4019-4023

http://www.ijcmph.com

pISSN 2394-6032 | eISSN 2394-6040

Effectiveness of eye donation orientation session in bridging the knowledge gap amongst undergraduate medical students in Delhi

Tanvi Jha1*, Vaishali Adlakha1, Aakriti Arora1, Vaishnavi Jayaram1, Nikita Mary Mundakel1, Damodar Bachani2


1Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

2Department of Community Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

Received: 08 June 2021

Revised: 14 July 2021

Accepted: 15 July 2021

*Correspondence:

Dr. Tanvi Jha,

E-mail: drtanvijha93@gmail.com

Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background: Corneal blindness may be curable by keratoplasty but the demand for eye donation is, however, unmet due to a variety of factors including knowledge gap. The purpose of this study was to assess the awareness of the medical undergraduate students towards eye donation and to assess the effectiveness of an orientation program in bridging the knowledge gap.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done on MBBS students of 2nd and 3rd professional years. A pretested questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge of medical students. Knowledge regarding the contraindications to eye donation, the procedure involved and common misconceptions were assessed. This was followed by a session on orientation regarding eye donation. A second assessment using the same questionnaire was done after the session to assess the effectiveness of the same. The data was analysed using EPIINFO version 3.5.4 using Chi square test.

Results: Less than 50% students were aware of contraindications and less than 10% students knew ideal cornea harvesting time and nearest eye bank to their homes. Less than one-fourth students knew common causes of corneal blindness. However, most (77%) students were aware that hospital staff must motivate deceased’s family for eye donation. Significant increase in awareness was observed post orientation regarding most issues.

Conclusions: This study shows that there is a knowledge gap amongst undergraduate medical students regarding eye donation. It also suggests that orientation sessions may be helpful in bridging this gap.

Keywords: Keratoplasty, Knowledge gap, Orientation, Medical students

INTRODUCTION

Corneal diseases comprise a significant cause of blindness in the developing world, including India. According to the WHO, corneal blindness follows cataract, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration as main causes of vision loss and blindness.1,2 It may not be possible to cure all cases of blindness, though many of them are avoidable. In many instances, corneal blindness is curable by keratoplasty.3 The demand for corneal transplantation is much higher than number of corneas donated annually. According to eye bank association of India, 11 lakh people in India are awaiting corneal transplantation.4 As against this, 59,810 eyes were donated in India during 2015-16, falling well short of the demand.5 Further, less than 50% of donated eyes are found suitable for transplantation.6

The barriers to corneal transplantation include low levels of eye donation, cornea retrieval and its utilization.

Barriers to eye donation include perception of incompatibility with religious teachings, lack of awareness about the practice of eye donation, lack of familial support and fear of improper treatment of donors’ body.7,8 Medical barriers include corneal vascularization, adherent leukoma, glaucoma, retinal disease and ocular surface disease. During retrieval and transplantation, lack of trained eye surgeons, underdevelopment of eye banking services and high cost of keratoplasty lead to non-utilization and wastage of donated tissue.9

In recent years, eye banking system in India has got a boost due to deployment of professional eye bankers and implementation of hospital cornea retrieval programs (HCRP), where counsellors approach and motivate members of the deceased’s family for eye donation. In contrast to the voluntary eye donation program which is considered inefficient, the potential of eye donation through HCRP is reported to be as high as 86%.9,10

For successful implementation of HCRP, adequate knowledge about the process of eye donation is needed, especially among the medical and paramedical staff. A study conducted in Nepal on awareness amongst medical and paramedical students about eye donation concluded that there is a need for regular eye donation awareness programs in not only the community but also for the medical and paramedical staff in medical colleges and hospitals.11 A similar study conducted amongst medical students in Delhi, India to assess the perception of first year medical students on eye donation showed that 85.5% students were willing to donate their eyes but lacked the knowledge regarding the process of corneal retrieval. It observed that medical students can be involved in the motivation of patients and relatives to pledge their eyes and can be trained to perform grief counselling for donating eyes.12

Recently, a study has demonstrated that even in the presence of awareness amongst the general public about eye donation, only a catalyst in the crucial hours following death can ensure that the corneas are harvested.13 Presence of such a catalyst is essential for success of HCRP. The role of medical students, as future leaders in healthcare and as chief motivators, counsellors and fieldworkers in promoting eye donation and removing the stigma associated with it, is being increasingly recognized worldwide.11,14 It is thus, crucial to promote awareness and to train medical students to secure their role as catalysts in HCRP. There is also need to devise concrete strategies and study their effectiveness in bridging the knowledge gap of students.

The present study aimed to assess the awareness of the medical undergraduate students towards eye donation using a pre designed questionnaire, followed by an orientation session on eye donation awareness. Same questionnaire was used after the session to assess the outcomes in knowledge of the students on this subject.

METHODS

Study design

This cross-sectional study used a 17-item pretested and self-administered questionnaire to assess the knowledge of students regarding eye donation and corneal transplantation. Participation in the assessment was voluntary and no identifying details were sought.

Study population

MBBS students at a government medical college in New Delhi participated in the pre and post orientation assessments in 3 batches conducted between 21st to 23rd August 2019. The respondents were from 2nd and 3rd professional years. Out of a total of 574 students in these batches, all students who consented to fill the survey were enrolled in the study.

Knowledge assessment and data collection

Prior to administration, the questionnaire was pretested on twenty students and was suitably modified. The first round of the assessment was done in students’ classroom. Verbal consent was taken after explaining the purpose and implication of the assessment. The questionnaire was distributed and the students were explained the method of filling the questionnaire. The administrators supervised the filling of the forms and collected the same after 5 minutes. After filling of questionnaires, a session on eye donation awareness was conducted. Topics covered in the session included the epidemiology of blindness national program for control of blindness, causes and management of corneal blindness, voluntary eye donation, hospital cornea retrieval program and methods of counseling grieving relatives. The second assessment was made after the session using the same questionnaire to assess the effectiveness of the session in bridging the knowledge gap of students.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using EPIINFO version 3.5.4. Chi square test was applied to assess proportions of correct responses before and after orientation session. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Information obtained before and after orientation session was academic in nature. Thus, the approval of the institutional ethics committee was not obtained. The data were collected within the principles of the declaration of Helsinki. Participation was voluntary and information was kept fully confidential and anonymous in nature.

RESULTS

Pre orientation questionnaire was filled by 551 students. 161 students who responded after the session on eye donation awareness were included in the study. 97 (60.2%) were from second professional MBBS and 64 (39.7%) students were from third professional MBBS year. Prior to orientation, more than half (56.52%) of the students were aware that pledging of eyes before death is not necessary for eye donation. Nearly 2/3rd (65.22%) students knew that cornea is the tissue required for transplantation. Only 38.51% students were aware that diabetes was not a contraindication and about 43% students were aware that age more than 75 years was not a contraindication for eye donation and that persons with cataract could donate eyes. Nearly half (49%) students were aware that acute viral hepatitis is a contraindication to eye donation. Significant increase in the awareness was observed after the orientation session (Table 1).

We also assessed knowledge of students regarding the procedure and locations of eye banks in Delhi. Only 8% students were aware of the location of the eye bank nearest to their homes. Less than 3% students were correctly aware about the ideal cornea-harvesting time (6 to 8 hours). Only one in five (20.5%) students knew that after retrieval, the tissue is not stored in normal saline. The knowledge regarding these issues increased significantly after orientation (Table 1).

Table 1: Knowledge about eye donation before and after orientation session of MBBS students (N=161).
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

*p<0.05 is statistically significant.

Nearly 64% students were acquainted with the fact that eye donation did not lead to any disfigurement of the eye which increased significantly to about 92% students after the session. A large percentage of students (77%) were of the view that hospital staff must motivate the deceased’s family for eye donation. Only one in three (34.78%) students knew that to maintain confidentiality, the identity of the donors and their family cannot be tracked. Correct response to this question increased significantly to over 70% after the orientation session (Table 1).

Knowledge regarding common causes of corneal blindness was very low (15.53%) which doubled after orientation (33.54%). Awareness regarding corneal blindness being the only blindness that can be treated by eye donation was present in 31% students, which increased significantly post orientation to 65.22%. The fact that human body can reject transplanted cornea was known to one in four students (24.22%). As many as 3 in 4 (74.53%) students became aware of this fact after orientation. Only 9% students had knowledge about eye donation fortnight organized in India, which although increased significantly post session, but was still low (22%) (Table 1).

DISCUSSION

Corneal blindness is a major cause of preventable and treatable blindness, especially in developing countries. Keratoplasty or corneal transplantation, which is used to treat corneal blindness, is the world’s most frequent type of transplantation performed. Despite this, it is well short of demand globally as demand of only 1 in 70 persons requiring corneal transplantation is met.15 Prevention and management of corneal blindness has, therefore, been one of the major focus areas of the national program for control of blindness in India.16 Professional eye banking and implementation of HCRP has the potential of bridging the demand supply gap because of its increased effectiveness in retrieving corneas from the deceased.10

Awareness about eye donation among medical practitioners is crucial to motivate members of the community for eye donation both inside and outside the hospitals. Tandon et al concluded in their study that prior knowledge of eye donation and literacy in donors in hospitals had no correlation with cornea procurement, whereas by active counselling, corneas can be retrieved in families with no prior knowledge about eye donation.17

Several surveys have been carried out to assess knowledge of medical practitioners regarding eye donation. Majority of participants were aware about eyes donation in studies by Arya et al and Singh et al in India, but lacked knowledge about specific aspects of eye donation such as the appropriate time for cornea retrieval and medical contraindications.11,12 Similar gaps in knowledge were observed in the study by Eze et al in Nigeria where there was no difference in knowledge level about eye donation among medical and non-medical students.18 In a study by Ali et al in Pakistan, the knowledge of first and fourth year medical students was comparable with respect to organ donation, suggesting paucity of teaching on the subject in medical curricula.7 Similar results were obtained in this study, where majority of medical students lacked specific knowledge about procedures and contraindications of eye donation.

The knowledge gap can be bridged by the means of awareness sessions, media campaigns and increased emphasis on organ donation in medical school curricula. In the present study, the knowledge of medical students regarding eye donation was assessed before and after a session on the same. Following the orientation session, there was a significant increase in knowledge related to various aspects of corneal blindness, corneal retrieval and keratoplasty. Most students were already aware that hospital staff was required to motivate the deceased’s family for eye donation and that eye donation did not lead to disfigurement. Awareness regarding causes of blindness did not increase significantly post session, thus required more focus during orientation sessions.

Very few students were able to enlist the common causes of corneal blindness prior to and post the session. There was significant increase in correct answers after their orientation showing the effect of such educational endeavours on increasing their knowledge base. Most students were also not aware that the eye donation fortnight is celebrated in India in the last week of August and first week of September and even though the correct answers increased significantly after the session, these were not up to desired levels. Active participation of students during the eye donation fortnight will make them more familiar about this campaign in promoting eye donation.

A limitation of the study was that the second assessment was carried out just after the orientation session. Longer interval between learning and retrieval of knowledge and facts has been associated with poor retention rate and spaced repetition has been suggested as a method to improve recall.19 Hence, it was suggested that such sessions should be held at regular intervals to refresh students’ knowledge. Further, sessions which simulate real life experience of talking to deceased’s family may help students become better motivators and counsellors. Inclusion of topics related to organ donation in medical curricula and more vigorous IEC activities are some of the other measures that can improve medical practitioners’ knowledge of the same.

CONCLUSION

The potential of medical students as important facilitators and promoters of eye donation has been recognized. Our study, however, shows that there is a knowledge gap amongst undergraduate medical students regarding eye donation. Hence, regular orientation sessions must be held to bridge this gap in knowledge and attitude. This could, in turn. help them in their role as catalysts for promotion of eye donation and removal of the stigma associated with it, thereby contributing to the battle against corneal blindness.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: Not required

REFERENCES

  1. 1. WHO. Fact Sheet: Blindness and Visual Impairment. 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. Accessed on 20 June 2021.
  2. 2. Gupta N, Tandon R, Gupta SK, Sreenivas V, Vashisht P. Burden of corneal blindness in India. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38(4):198-206.
  3. 3. Dandona R, Dandona L. Corneal blindness in a southern indian population: need for health promotion strategy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(2):133-41.
  4. 4. Eye Bank Association of India. Updating from Eye Bank Association of India. 2014. Available at: http://www.gaeba.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Session-1-Basak.pdf Accessed on 23 May 2021.
  5. 5. National Programme for Control of Blindness. Fact sheet: Statewise Targets and Achievements for Various Eye Diseases during 2015-16, 2016. Available at: http://npcb.nic.in/writereaddata/mainlinkfile/File320.pdf. Accessed on 23 May 2021.
  6. 6. Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Fact sheet: Preventing Wastage of Donated Eyes, 2015. Available at: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=115712. Accessed on 23 May 2021.
  7. 7. Ali NF, Qureshi A, Jilani BN, Zehra N. Knowledge and ethical perception regarding organ donation among medical students. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:38.
  8. 8. Paraz CMA, Truong HTT, Sai DK. Knowledge and attitudes toward corneal donation among Singaporean youth: a cross sectional study. Eye Vis (Lond). 2016;3:17.
  9. 9. Oliva MS, Schottman T, Gulati M. Turning the tide of corneal blindness. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(5):423-7.
  10. 10. Venugopal KC, Melsakkare SR, Manipur SR, Acharya P, Ramamurthy LB. Potential for hospital based corneal retrieval in Hassan district hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(8):5-7.
  11. 11. Arya SK, Gupta N, Malik A. Eye donation awareness among medical and paramedical staff in a medical institute. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2014;6(2):177-84.
  12. 12. Singh MM, Rahi M, Pagare D, Ingle GK. Medical students’ perception on eye donation in Delhi. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55(1):49-53.
  13. 13. Gogate B, Gogate P. Eye donation: mere awareness and willingness not enough. only a catalyst can improve corneal harvesting rates. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(4):332-3.
  14. 14. Okaye OI, Maduka-Okafor FC, Eze BI. What does the medical student know about eye donation/corneal transplant? the university of Nigeria scenario. West Indian Med J. 2010;59(1):41-4.
  15. 15. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):167-73.
  16. 16. DGHS. National Programme for Prevention and Control of Blindness & Visual Impairment. 2021. Available at: https://dghs.gov.in/content/1354_3_NationalProgrammeforControlofBlindnessVisual.aspx. Accessed on 23 May 2021.
  17. 17. Tandon R, Verma K, Vanathi M, Pandey RM, Vajpayee RB. Factors affecting eye donation from postmortem cases in a tertiary care hospital. Cornea. 2004;23(6):597-601.
  18. 18. Eze BI, Okoye O, Eze JN. Knowledge and attitudes regarding eye donation and corneal transplant: medical versus nonmedical university students in a developing country in Africa. Exp Clin Transplant. 2014;12(5):454-61.
  19. 19. Augustin M. How to learn effectively in medical school: test yourself, learn actively and repeat in intervals. Yale J Biol Med. 2014;87(2):207-12.