Review ArticleInternational Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publication: Pharmaceutical versus mechanical induction of labor
Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(10):4325-4329.DOI10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183871
Abstract
Labor induction is one of the most common obstetric interventions carried out in obstetric institutions. More than one fifth of labors needs induction. To date, many methods are available for labor induction with the pharmaceutical and mechanical methods being the commonest. The most common pharmaceutical agents used are prostaglandins, oxytocin, synthetic progesterone antagonists, and nitric oxide. Mechanical induction is carried out through using balloon catheters, hygroscopic dilators, artificial membrane rupture, or membrane stripping. Though pharmaceutical methods had largely replaced mechanical induction of labor, no consensus guidelines recommend their use. Studies from literature are still conflicting. However, it is generally agreed that the use of a combined approach with both pharmaceutical and mechanical methods of induction yields the best outcome. This article will review the different methods for labor induction, their effectiveness, and adverse events.
Keywords
Affiliations
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Etoile First Clinic, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
- Quality of Medicine, Advanced International Pharmaceutical Company (AIPCO), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pharmacy, Southern Region Armed Forces Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia
