International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

Midya MZ et al. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022 May;10(5):1132-1138

www.msjonline.org

pISSN 2320-6071 | eISSN 2320-6012

Knowledge and awareness about optometry profession among rural versus urban population in Eastern India: a survey-based study

M. Zakaria Midya1, Salal Khan2*, Priti Chandra Halder3, Riju Ghosh4, Arsalan Mudassar5, Arna Mitra6, Shreya Kundu7, Manisha Maity3, Swarnali Pal3


1Zylux Corporations Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

2Department of Optometry, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

³Department of Optometry, Haldia Institute of Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

4Department of Optometry, Diamond Harbor Medical College and Hospital, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India

5Department of Optometry, Pailan College of Management and Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

6Department of Optometry, JIMS Hospital and Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

7Department of Optometry, Vivekanand Mission Asram Netra Niramay Niketan, Haldia, India

Received: 21 March 2022

Revised: 11 April 2022

Accepted: 13 April 2022

*Correspondence:

Salal Khan,

E-mail: salal.21smas2040005@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in

Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background: The main purpose of this study was to determine the awareness of optometry and to create awareness of optometry among rural and urban population of Kolkata.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among rural and urban population. A total of 671 participants- male=378 and female=293, were enrolled in this study. An amplified self-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the participants through a survey camp.

Results: Out of 671 subjects, (328 rural and 343 urban subjects), 62 (18.9%) and 166 (48.3%) (95%, CI: 1.93-1.88) were know about optometry in rural and urban population respectively. 4.9% and 14% (95%, CI: 1.97-1.94) did knew the difference between optometrist and ophthalmologists, while in participants opinion optometrist is assistant of ophthalmologist was 3.4% and 1.5% (95%, CI: 2.69-2.61) in rural and urban participants respectively. However, 18.2% (rural) and 32% (urban) (95%, CI: 2.31-2.17) participants think that optometrist is trained in detection and recognition of eye diseases while 22.6% and 26.8% (95%, CI: 3.20-3.02) thinks they can prescribe spectacles and contact lens independently in rural and urban participants respectively. All factors mentioned were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) with the Chi square and ANOVA test in SPSS version 21.

Conclusions: These findings seem to indicate lack of awareness and knowledge about optometry profession. There is a need to increase campaign in these areas via educational programs, awareness survey camp, a poster explaining the eye care, social media regarding eye care provider’s duties and practices, exhibitions for public concerning the profession of optometry.

Keywords: Optometry, Eye-care services, Primary eye-care, Optometrist

INTRODUCTION

According to the American heritage dictionary, optometrist is a person who is professionally trained and licensed to examine the eyes for visual defects, diagnose problems or impairments, and prescribe corrective lenses or provide other types of treatment.1 According to the world council of optometry (WCO), optometrists are ‘primary healthcare practitioners of the eye and vision system, who can successfully manage the leading cause of vision impairment (refractive error) and can also help alleviate the burden of other causes of blindness through diagnosis, referral and co-management’.2

As specialists, optometrists have a major role in detecting potentially severe eye diseases such as cataract, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration, and general health conditions such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, which affect the eye. In a way, ‘eye care’ professionals, are a essential part of ‘health care professionals’ because we are the first point of contact for any eye ailment and in the process of providing optimal eye care we also detect systemic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus etc.3-5 Optometry services diversify across different country. An optometrist does practise in multiple areas like hospital/clinic-based practise, academics, optical retail, eye health research, administration, marketing, and independent private practice.6

Salient features of optometry eye care services:7-8 Educating patients about maintaining and promoting healthy vision, performing a comprehensive examination of the visual system, screening for eye diseases and conditions affecting vision that may be asymptomatic in early stage, recognizing ocular manifestations of systemic diseases and systemic effects of ocular medications, making a differential and definitive diagnosis for any detected ocular abnormalities, performing proper refractions (subjective as well as objective method), fitting and prescribing optical aids, such as spectacles and contact lenses (including the specialized ones), deciding on a treatment plan and treating patient’s eye care needs with appropriate therapies or exercises, counselling and educating patients about their eye disease conditions, recognizing and managing local and systemic effects of drug therapy, determining when to triage patients for more specialized care and referring to specialists as when needed and seemed appropriate, coordinating patient care with other physicians involved in the patient’s overall medical management.

The profession of optometry is a mixture of legal, educational, practice, management, service delivery and public health initiatives that is unique to every country and based on culture, educational and regulatory frameworks.9-10 The aim of WCO was to promote the establishment of a common global standard of optometric care for the benefit of the public at large. Refractive error management is optometry's core business as uncorrected refractive error is the second highest cause of blindness and the main cause of visual impairment globally.11,12 The awareness and knowledge of eye care services, training hierarchy, professional roles, capabilities and responsibilities have been identified as important parameters influencing their utilization of available eye care services.13 Prior studies suggest that the knowledge toward the differences between ophthalmologists and optometrists is lacking.14-17 To our knowledge, there is limited contemporary literature or information about the public’s awareness in regard to the differences between ophthalmologists and optometrists in India.18-21

Objectives

The knowledge generated from this study will give a basic picture to key decision-makers and educators concerning the support needs of future participants in neglected areas, creating awareness strategies for rural and urban population, and developing informed human resources which would be more efficient in-service delivery in eye health care.

METHODS

Research design

This study was a cross-sectional survey-based study among rural and urban population in Eastern India. The study included all the profession (worker, business-man, tailor, house wife, barber, service man, students, nurse, fisher, teachers, sales man), who agreed to participate in this study. The study was conducted in Eastern India (Kolkata, West Bengal).

Time frame

Current study was conducted between October to December month of 2021.

Sample size

It was included 671 participants including rural and urban area participants.

Procedure

This study was included clustered-sampling methods to collect the data by adopted a validated questionnaire previously used in a related study in India and Abroad.22-26 The questionnaire was modified according to objective of this study, it was entitled as a Google form questionnaire to delivered electronically in eastern zone of India by an awareness camp of optography, who agreed (rural & urban population) to participate in this study. It comprised 19 close-ended questions that explored demographic data, knowledge and awareness about optometry profession.

Inclusion criteria

Current study included only rural and urban populations, age 20 years to 70 years, who agreed to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Current study excluded population, age <20 years or >70 years and who not agreed to participate in this study.

Data analysis

Data were captured and analysed with the statistical programme of social sciences (SPSS) version 21. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse values such as frequencies, mean, standard deviation, cross tabulation and percentage of collected data. Pearson Chi-square and One-way ANOVA test was used to analyse association between relevant variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The analysis was shows that out of 671 subjects, (328 rural and 343 urban subjects), 62 (18.9%) and 166 (48.3%) (95%, CI: 1.93-1.88) were know about Optometry in rural and urban population respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Rural and urban participant’s knowledge score about optometry. | 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rural Urban 18.9 48.4 81.1 41.6 Yes No
Figure 1: Rural and urban participant’s knowledge score about optometry.
Figure 2: Gender distribution (rural and urban). | Male Female 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Rural Urban 56.4 56.3 43.6 43.7 Male Female
Figure 2: Gender distribution (rural and urban).

Total 4.9% and 14% (95% CI: 1.97-1.94) did knew the difference between optometrist and ophthalmologists, while in participants opinion optometrist is assistant of ophthalmologist was 3.4% and 1.5% (95% CI: 2.69-2.61) in rural and urban participants respectively. However 39.1% and 47.5% (95% CI: 1.65-1.58) have done eye examination, 29.3% and 32.6% (95% CI: 1.56-1.48) have spectacle correction in rural and urban participants respectively.

Table 1: Demographic data of rural and urban participants (n=671).
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3
Figure 3: Rural and urban participant’s knowledge about difference between optometrist and ophthalmologist. | 0 20 40 60 Rural Urban 4.9 14 42.7 55.4 52.4 30.6 Yes No Don't know
Figure 3: Rural and urban participant’s knowledge about difference between optometrist and ophthalmologist.

Total 18.2% (rural) and 32% (urban) (95% CI: 2.31-2.17) participants think that optometrist is trained in detection and recognition of eye diseases while 22.6% and 26.8% (95% CI: 3.20-3.02) thinks they can prescribe spectacles and contact lens independently in rural and urban participants respectively.

Table 2: Participants responses on knowledge about Optometry profession.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 4
Table 3: Participants knowledge level about role of an optometrist.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 4

The participants when asked about who consider as a primary eye care professional, so 48.2% (rural) & 35.8% (urban) (95%, CI: 2.74-2.55) do not know while 28% & 34.9% (95%, CI: 2.48-2.30) knows optometrist are primary eye care professionals in rural and urban participants respectively (Table 2). All factors mentioned were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) with the Pearson Chi-square and One-ANOVA test in SPSS version 21. The demographic data of rural and urban population, in which mentioned the age, gender (M>F), marital status (married>unmarried), literacy (literate >illiterate in urban population and vice versa in rural population), occupation (worker, business-man, tailor, house wife, barber, service man, students, nurse, fisher, teachers, sales man) is depicted in (Table 1). The gender distribution in rural (M:F 56.4%: 43.6% ) and urban population (M:F 56.3%: 43.7%) is shown in (Figure 2). The rural and urban participant’s knowledge about the difference between optometrist and ophthalmologist is shown in (Figure 3). In which, rural participants knows about optometry 4.9% and urban participants 14%. Hence 52.4% & 30.6% participants in rural and urban respectively didn’t knew about optometry.

Figure 4: Rural participants responses on which of them consider as primary eye-care professional.
Figure 4: Rural participants responses on which of them consider as primary eye-care professional.
Figure 5: Urban participants responses on which of them consider as primary eye-care professional.
Figure 5: Urban participants responses on which of them consider as primary eye-care professional.

DISCUSSION

The presence of a significant professional overlap between the ophthalmologist and optometrist creates public misconceptions regarding the specific roles and duties for which each has in the vision health system among common populations. The survey analysis shows that 81.1% and 51.7% rural and urban responders respectively were unaware about Optometry and 18.9% and 48.3% were aware of the study which is very less as compared to the study done by Aldebas et al 68% of awareness about optometry.27 In current study sample shows that 18.2% and 32% rural and urban responders respectively think that Optometrist is trained in detection and recognition of eye diseases while 81.8% & 68% think they are not trained in rural and urban responders respectively. The public knowledge in our study is less as compared to Eze et al report which shows 55.6% of the participants were knowledgeable regarding the difference in training requirements.28

The present study shows evidence that 16.5% respondents think ophthalmologist conduct eye examination, 37.8% think optometrist and 27.4% think both can conduct eye examination and 18.3% not sure while Okoye et al study revealed that 18.5% of the participants were knowledgeable about the specific tasks for both ophthalmologist and optometrist.29 The responders, when asked about the difference between ophthalmologist and optometrist so 4.9% and 14% in rural and urban responders respectively knew the difference and the remaining 95.1% and 86% do not know the difference between the optometrist and ophthalmologist. The 29.3% and 32.6% rural and urban responders respectively in the present study was lesser the study done by Guffy et al (56%) and Eze (55.6%).28,30 44.4% of the subjects had a history of wearing glasses while 70.7% and 67.4% in rural and urban responders respectively did not wear it which was very less as compared to the study done by Desalegn et al and Osogbo.31,32

Limitations

The limitation of current study was to collect the data on the basis of rural and urban participants response, not done any comprehensive examination or provide any eye care accessories (like spectacles, contact lenses, sunglasses, reading glasses), only provided knowledge and create awareness about the optometry by the posters and speech etc.

CONCLUSION

These findings seem to indicate lack of awareness and knowledge about optometry profession among rural population is greater than urban participants in Kolkata (Eastern India). There is a need to increase campaign in these areas via educational programs, awareness survey camp, a poster explaining the eye care, social media regarding eye care provider’s duties and practices, exhibitions for the public concerning the profession of optometry. This study also showed a relatively low level of public knowledge of the difference between the role of the ophthalmologist and optometrist among a rural and rural population as well, there is an essential demand from the policy maker and ministry of health for awareness enhancement through campaigns and social media regarding eye care provider’s duties and practices. It is also recommended for researchers to conduct further similar studies in rural populations and consider different methods to include street adults and adults in firms to get more generalizable result.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Author would like to thanks, Optography survey team have contributed in data collection and Gobinda Chandra Mondal (founder and advisor at optography, India) and Dr. Kamal Pant (associate professor and HOD, department of optometry, UPUMS, Saifai), who have assisted greatly till the execution of this article. Authors sincerely thank and acknowledge the rural and urban subjects for their participation in the study.

Funding: Zylux Corporations Pvt. Ltd. India and Optography

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee

REFERENCES

  1. 1. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2000.
  2. 2. Optometrist. Available at: https://worldcouncilofoptometry.info/aboutus/who-is-an-optometrist. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  3. 3. International Optometric and Optical League. Available at: https://europepmc.org. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  4. 4. Smith DP. The 75th anniversary of the World Council of Optometry. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:210-3.
  5. 5. Optometry. Available at: https://visionplusmag.com/optometry/need-for-regulation-of-optometry-as-a-profession-in-india-an-overview/. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  6. 6. Thite N. Pattern of optometry practice and range of services in India. Optomet Vision Sci. 2015;92(5):615-22.
  7. 7. Definition of primary eye care. Available at: https://www.lawinsider.com. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  8. 8. Salal K, Kamal P. Optometrist, a primary eye care provider: an underutilized and untapped human resource in India; EPRA Int J Multidiscip Res. 2021; 7(9):58-63.
  9. 9. Rakhi D, Dandona L. Refractive error blindness. Bull World Health Org. 2001;79(3):237-43.
  10. 10. Serge R. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Org. 2008;1:63-70.
  11. 11. Brien HA. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126(12):1731-9.
  12. 12. David Y. The global initiative vison 2020: the right to sight childhood blindness. Commu Eye Health. 1999; 12(31):44.
  13. 13. Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Smith W. Use of eye care services by older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1999;27(5):294-300.
  14. 14. Guffey R. Patient knowledge of physician responsibilities and their preferences for care in ophthalmology teaching clinics. Ophthalmol. 2009; 116(9):1610-4.
  15. 15. Wilson MR. Does the public understand the differences between ophthalmologists and optometrists?. Ophthal Epidemiol. 1994;1(3):121-9.
  16. 16. Foster A. Red eye: the role of primary care; community eye heal. Int Centre Eye Health. 2005;18(53):69.
  17. 17. Soroka M. Knowledge and use of eye care services by college and health professional students: implications for the profession. Optomet Vision Sci. 1979;56(3): 187-92.
  18. 18. Optometrist. Available at: https://aapos.org/glossary/difference-between-an-ophthalmologist-optometrist-and-optician. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  19. 19. Eye health. Available at: https://www.healthline.com/health/eye-health/optometrist-vs-ophthalmologist. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  20. 20. Eye care. Available at: https://www.verywellhealth.com/optometrist-vs-ophthalmologist-5094869. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  21. 21. Opthamologists. Available at: https://www.webmd.com/eye-health/eye-doctors-optometrists-ophthalmologists. Accessed on 15 January 2022.
  22. 22. Chan VF, Loughman J, Moodley VR, Bilotto L, Naidoo K. Student educational background, perceptions and expectations toward optometry: An emerging eye health profession in Mozambique. Optometric Edu. 2015;40(2):67-9.
  23. 23. Dubey G. A cross-sectional survey evaluating the awareness about the optometry profession among residents in areas of district Etawah. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2019;10(5):32489-93.
  24. 24. Aldebasi MH. Public awareness regarding the differences between ophthalmologists and optometrists among Saudi Adults Living in Riyadh: a quantitative study. J Ophthalmol. 2018.
  25. 25. Hardigan PC, Cohen SR. Comparison of personality styles between students enrolled in osteopathic medicine, pharmacy, physical therapy, physician assistant and occupational therapy programmes. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1998;98:637-41.
  26. 26. Nordhalm LA, Westbrook MT. Career development of female physiotherapists: stage four of a longitudinal survey. Aus J Physio. 1985;31:10-6.
  27. 27. Aldebasi MH. Public Awareness regarding the Differences between Ophthalmologists and Optometrist among Saudi Adults Living in Riyadh: A Quantitative Study. J Ophthalmol. 2018.
  28. 28. Eze BI, Okoye O, Aguwa EN. Public's knowledge of the differences between ophthalmologists and Optometrist: a critical issue in eye care service utilization. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(9):1336-42.
  29. 29. Eze BI, Okoye O, Aguwa EN. Public’s knowledge of the differences between ophthalmologists and Optometrist: a critical issue in eye care service utilisation. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(9):1336-42.
  30. 30. Guffey R, Juzych N, Juzych M. Patient knowledge of physician responsibilities and their preferences for care in ophthalmology teaching clinics. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(9):1610-4.
  31. 31. Desalegn A, Tsegaw A, Shiferaw D, Woretaw H. Knowledge, attitude, practice and associated factors towards spectacles use among adults in Gondar town, northwest Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1): 184.
  32. 32. Woretaw H. Beliefs and attitude towards spectacles. Osogbo, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2009;12(4):359-61.
  33. 33. Ashraf F, Mobeen R. Status of awareness of optometry and primary eye care services among common population in district bhimber, azad Kashmir. Ophthal Pak. 2017;7(4):47-9.