International Surgery Journal

Rahman A et al. Int Surg J. 2023 Jan;10(1):18-22

http://www.ijsurgery.com

pISSN 2349-3305 | eISSN 2349-2902

A retrospective study among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: intraoperative and postoperative complications

Anharur Rahman1*, Motiur Rahman2, M. Saief Uddin3, Abu Taher4, Mohammad Golam Masum5


1Department of Surgery, Ad-Din Akiz Medical College, Khulna, Bangladesh

2Department of Surgery, Central Hospital Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh

3Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

4Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

5Department of General Surgery, Kumuduni Women's Medical College, Mirzapur, Tangail, Bangladesh

Received: 17 November 2022

Revised: 10 December 2022

Accepted: 13 December 2022

*Correspondence:

Dr. Anharur Rahman,

E-mail: anhar92@gmail.com

Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a popular method to treat gallbladder diseases. But adopting laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a treatment of gallbladder diseases like symptomatic cholelithiasis or cholecystitis introduced a new spectrum of associated intraoperative and postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to assess the intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in department of surgery of Lab Aid Hospital, Dhanmondi Central Hospital, and Ad Din Barrister Rafiqul Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period from December 2019 to December 2021 among 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were collected from the record book of the patients for this study with consent from the patients and guardians. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Lab Aid Hospital and Ad Din Barrister Rafiqul Hospital, Dhaka.

Results: Majority of the study people (30%) were in the age group of 52-60 years. Mean age of the study people was 50.6 years (SD±8.1 years). Majority of the study people (59%) ware female. Mean BMI of the study people was 23.33±2.26 kg/m2. Among the study people, 21% study people had smoking habit, 19% had diabetes, and 11% had hypertension. Mean operation time was 50.25±4.75 minutes. For the indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, most of the study people (56%) had symptomatic gallstones. The commonest intraoperative complication was trocar site bleeding (8%). The commonest postoperative complication was surgical site infection (5%).

Conclusions: Although there were few intraoperative and postoperative complications, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low rate of mortality and morbidity making this operation a safe procedure with favourable results.

Keywords: Intraoperative and postoperative complications, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

The benign gallbladder illnesses with the most widespread clinical recognition are cholelithiasis and cholecystitis.1 The most crucial kind of therapy is surgery.2 Laparoscopic surgery has grown in importance as a method of surgery thanks to the development of minimally invasive concepts and technology.3 The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in humans is widely ascribed to Mouret in 1987, who drew on his background in gynecological procedures and appendicectomy.4

For the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis, laparoscopy has replaced surgery as the preferred method, and more operations are being performed for acute cholecystitis (AC).5-9 Injuries to the bile duct, which were uncommon with open cholecystectomy, were documented in as many as 5% of patients as laparoscopic cholecystectomy became more widely accepted.10 In 2007, almost 750,000 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were carried out in the United States (representing about 90% of all cholecystectomies), but despite growing familiarity with the surgery, the significant complication rate is still higher than with open cholecystectomy.11,12 Due to the general decline in expertise with open surgery and the fact that this method is now only used for the most difficult and demanding cases, the open cholecystectomy complication rate has also increased.13 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with serious problems, such as bile duct damage, bile leaks, hemorrhage, and intestinal injury. These difficulties can be partly attributed to patient selection, surgical inexperience, and the technological limitations of the minimally invasive procedure.12,14-18

Diathermy burns, which typically impact the right or common hepatic ducts and might first go unrecognized, are a significant cause of ductal damage. These elements, together with the natural consequences of biliary system conditions including inflammation and scarring, have given rise to the idea of “stop rules” for surgeons doing this procedure. In summary, early conversion to an open method should be readily recognized as the right path if a safe dissection cannot be achieved laparoscopically.19,20 It is impossible to ignore the intraoperative and fresh postoperative complications.

The range of problems in gallbladder surgery has evolved as a result of the broad acceptance of this procedure.21 Due to the surgeons’ greater experience, the procedure’s growing popularity, and the development of new equipment, intraoperative problems such bowel and vascular damage (trocar site), biliary leak, and bile duct injuries are on the decline.22

The total morbidity and mortality have been estimated at 2-6% and 0.1-0.5%, respectively, in several significant prospective studies.23-25 There have been very few studies about the intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thus, this current study was conducted to assess the intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Objectives

To assess the intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in department of surgery of Lab Aid Hospital, Dhanmondi Central Hospital, and Ad Din Barrister Rafiqul Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period from December 2019 to December 2021. Total 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were collected from the record book of the patients for this study. Consent of the patients and guardians were taken before collecting data. After collection of data, all data were checked and cleaned. After cleaning, the data were entered into computer and statistical analysis of the results being obtained by using windows-based computer software devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences version 22. After compilation, data were presented in the form of tables, figures and charts, as necessary. Numerical variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, whereas categorical variables were count with percentage.

Inclusion criteria

All age groups, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Patients undergoing open cholecystectomy, patients transferred to another hospital.

Ethical Consideration

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Lab Aid Hospital and Ad Din Barrister Rafiqul Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

RESULTS

Total 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study.

Majority of the study people (59%) ware female. Mean BMI of the study people was 23.33±2.26 kg/m2. Among the study people, 21% study people had smoking habit, 19% had diabetes, and 11% had hypertension. Mean operation time was 50.25±4.75 minutes.

Table 2 demonstrates the indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Most of the study people (56%) had symptomatic gallstones. Table 3 shows the intraoperative complications of the study people. Among the study people, 8% had trocar site bleeding, 7% had liver bed injury, 5% had bile leakage from GB, 2% had bleeding from calots, 2% had bile duct injury.

Table 4 demonstrates the postoperative complications of the study people. Among the study people, 5% had surgical site infection, 4% had jaundice, 3% had biliary peritonitis, 2% had intra-abdominal collections, 1% had bile leakage, 1% had fecal peritonitis and no death record.

Table 1: Baseline data of the study people (n=100).
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3
Table 2: Indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3
Table 3: Intraoperative complications of the study people.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3
Table 4: Postoperative complications of the study people.
Table reproduced from source PDF page 3

DISCUSSION

This current study was conducted to assess the intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Total 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. Majority of the study people (30%) were in the age group of 52-60 years. Mean age of the study people was 50.6±8.1 years. Majority of the study people (59%) ware female. Which indicates that women are more prone to gallbladder diseases. In the study of Giger et al, among 22,953 patients mean±SD age was 54.5±16.1 years and most of the study people were female (68.6%) which is similar to our study.26 Mean BMI of the study people was 23.33±2.26 kg/m2 in our study. In the study of Yang et al, among 144 study people, mean±SD BMI was 22.83±2.15 kg/m2 in research group and 22.36±2.23 kg/m2 in control group.27 In this study, 21% study people had smoking habit, 19% had diabetes, and 11% had hypertension. In the study of Yang et al, in research group 47.37% had smoking habit, 17.11% had diabetes, and 27.63% had hypertension.27 In control group, 36.76% had smoking habit, 16.18% had diabetes, and 23.53% had hypertension.

In this study, mean operation time was 50.25±4.75 minutes. In the study of Yang et al mean ±SD operation time in research group was 48.32±3.84 minutes and mean ±SD operation time in control group was 49.07±3.42 minutes.27 The commonest indication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was symptomatic gallstones (56%) in our study. In the study of Z’graggen et al, symptomatic gallstones was also the commonest (87.9%) indication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.28 In this study, the commonest intraoperative complications was trocar site bleeding (8%), followed by 7% had liver bed injury, 5% had bile leakage from GB, 2% had bleeding from calots, 2% had bile duct injury.

Familiar results were found in the study of Agarwal et al where the most frequent intraoperative complication was trocar site bleeding and liver bed injury, 7%, followed by bile leakage from gallbladder 6%, bleeding from calots triangle in 4% and spilled gallstones in 2% cases.29 In this study, the commonest postoperative complications was surgical site infection (5%), followed by 4% had jaundice, 3% had biliary peritonitis, 2% had intra-abdominal collections, 1% had bile leakage, and 1% had fecal peritonitis and no death record. Amreek et al found similar results where most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection (2.7%), followed by 0.9% had jaundice, 0.8% had biliary peritonitis, 0.6% had intra-abdominal collections, 0.4% had bile leakage, 0.3% had fecal peritonitis and 0.1% had retained CBD stones.30

In our study, there was small sample size and absence of control for comparison. Study population was selected from one center in Tangail, so may not represent wider population. The study was conducted at a short period of time. The sampling was retrospective and there was no random allocation, so there was risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSION

Although there were few intraoperative and postoperative complications, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low rate of mortality and morbidity making this operation a safe procedure with favorable results. Further study with large sample size is required to have better understanding.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Lab Aid Hospital and Ad Din Barrister Rafiqul Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Olthof PB, Metman MJH, de Krijger RR, Scheepers JJ, Roos D, Dekker JWT. Routine pathology and postoperative follow-up are not cost-effective in cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. World J Surg. 2018;42:3165-70.
  2. 2. Zhong H, Hao TT, Chen Y, Luo F. Unexpected gallbladder cancer during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and experience of diagnosis and treatment of 22 cases. Am Surg. 2019;85:671-5.
  3. 3. Bafort C, Beebeejaun Y, Tomassetti C, Bosteels J, Duffy JM. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10:CD011031.
  4. 4. Mouret G. From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future perspectives. Dig Surg. 1991;8:124-5.
  5. 5. Mosimann F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the new gold standard for the management of symptomatic gallbladder stones. Hepatogastro-enterology. 2006;53(69):1.
  6. 6. Kitano S, Matsumoto T, Aramaki M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(5):534-7.
  7. 7. Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999;44(3):187-92.
  8. 8. Sain AH. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current ‘‘gold standard’’ for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg. 1996;224(5):689-90.
  9. 9. Willsher PC, Sanabria JR, Gallinger S, Rossi L, Strasberg S, Litwin DE. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure. J Gastroint Surg. 1999;3(1):50-3.
  10. 10. Dixon E, Vollmer Jr CM, May GR, eds. Management of Benign Biliary Stenosis and Injury: A Comprehensive Guide, Springer International Publishing: Switzerland; 2015.
  11. 11. Vollmer CM Jr, Callery MP. Biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem? Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1039.
  12. 12. Khan MH, Howard TJ, Fogel EL, Sherman S, McHenry L, Watkins JL, et al. Frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastroint Endosc. 2007;65(2):247-52.
  13. 13. Visser BC, Parks RW, Garden OJ. Open cholecystectomy in the laparoendoscopic era. Am J Surg. 2008;195:108.
  14. 14. Catarci M, Zaraca F, Scaccia M, Carboni M. Lost intraperitoneal stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: harmless sequela or reason for reoperation? Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:318.
  15. 15. Cervantes J, Rojas GA, Ponte R. Intrahepatic subcapsular biloma. A rare complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:208.
  16. 16. Stupak D, Cohen S, Kasmin F, Lee Y, Siegel JH. Intra-abdominal actinomycosis 11 years after spilled gallstones at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(6):542-4.
  17. 17. Roberts DJ, Chun HM. Dropped gallstone as a nidus of intra-abdominal abscess complicated by empyema. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:e64.
  18. 18. Binenbaum SJ, Goldfarb MA. Inadvertent enterotomy in minimally invasive abdominal surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2006;10(3):336.
  19. 19. Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:598.
  20. 20. Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:604.
  21. 21. Asbun HJ. Technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1994:74;755-75.
  22. 22. Shamiyeh A, Wanyand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complication and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:164-71.
  23. 23. Airan M, Appel M, Berci G, Coburg AJ, Cohen M, Cuschieri A, et al. Retrospective and prospective multi-institutional laparoscopic cholecystectomy study organized by the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc. 1992;6(4):169-76.
  24. 24. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991;213(1):3.
  25. 25. Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(16):1073-8.
  26. 26. Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Inderbitzin DT, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L, et al. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(5):723-8.
  27. 27. Yang A, Gao F. Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol on stress response, hemodynamics, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Translat Res. 2021;13(10):11824.
  28. 28. Z'graggen K, Wehrli H, Metzger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(11):1303-10.
  29. 29. Agarwal S, Joshi AD. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional observational study. Int Surg J. 2020;7(5):1490-5.
  30. 30. Amreek FN, Hussain SZ, Mnagi MH, Rizwan A. Retrospective analysis of complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Cureus. 2019;11(7).