Understanding imposter syndrome: a comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Imposter syndrome (IS) was first identified by psychologists Suzanne Imes and Pauline Clance in the 1970s, refers to the belief that one's success is unjustified and the apprehension of being revealed as a fraud despite evidence of competence and achievements.¹ While initially observed predominantly among high-achieving women, IS has since been recognized as a widespread phenomenon affecting individuals across gender, age, and professional backgrounds.² This review aims to delve into the intricacies of IS, exploring its psychological underpinnings, manifestations, prevalence rates, and potential interventions.

Although IS is a widely studied, frequently experienced, and pervasive phenomenon, its exact prevalence remains unknown. To date, there is no official or universally accepted medical definition-such as inclusion in the DSM-V. Nevertheless, despite the absence of formal diagnostic criteria, the original six features described by Clance have since been elaborated upon. These now encompass a set of interrelated traits that may or may not be present in individuals with IS: the imposter cycle, perfectionism, super-heroism, atychiphobia (fear of failure), denial of competence, and achievemephobia (fear of success).^3,4

THE IMPOSTER CYCLE

A hallmark feature of IS is the imposter cycle, which typically arises when individuals are presented with a task, challenge, or responsibility related to achievement. Those experiencing IS tended to respond in one of two general ways: either through over-preparation or procrastination.

In the case of over-preparation, individuals believe they must work significantly harder than others to reach the same outcome. This belief-despite being objectively incorrect-reinforces the perception that they are inadequate or fraudulent. On the other hand, procrastination leads to last-minute efforts, which then fuel the belief that they are imposters because they didn’t prepare "properly" and fear being discovered as a fraud.

Regardless of the approach taken, once the task is completed, individuals may feel a brief sense of accomplishment. However, due to factors such as the other interwoven characteristics of IS, the fleeting nature of this success, or possible neurobiological elements not yet fully understood, this accomplishment is not internalized. As a result, feelings of anxiety, self-doubt, and fraudulence reemerge-setting the stage for the cycle to begin again with the next task.⁵

PERFECTIONISM

Originally outlined by Clance et al as the intense "need to be the best," this trait exists on a continuum of hyper-competitiveness and perfectionistic tendencies. Those with IS often impose unrealistically high standards upon themselves. These unattainable expectations perpetuate a harmful cycle where the individual constantly strives to meet impossible goals.

This perfectionism may lead to behaviours such as self-sacrifice for perceived higher goals (often referred to as "work martyrdom"), magnifying small mistakes as proof of incompetence, and engaging in excessively critical self-evaluation. These patterns contribute to what is described as the "super-heroism" aspect of IS.⁶

SUPER-HEROISM

Super-heroism, frequently reported in individuals with IS, stems directly from the drive to be perfect. It typically appears as excessive preparation in order to appear unquestionably capable. This behaviour arises from the impossibly high standards described earlier and often results in significant emotional and mental exhaustion.⁷

ATYCHIPHOBIA (FEAR OF FAILURE)

Fear of failure is a prominent aspect of IS and becomes particularly intense when individuals face tasks that test their abilities-whether these expectations come from themselves or others. Those with IS often feel anxiety and dread about failing or performing worse than others, fearing exposure and humiliation if they are perceived as less competent.⁸

DENIAL OF COMPETENCE AND CAPABILITY

Closely linked to perfectionism, this trait involves a tendency to downplay or completely deny one’s own intelligence, talents, and skills. Individuals often attribute success to external factors like luck or help from others, rather than recognizing their own effort and competence. Failures, however, are readily internalized and seen as personal shortcomings.

ACHIEVEMEPHOBIA (FEAR OF SUCCESS)

This refers to the reluctance to acknowledge or accept personal success. Individuals with IS often struggle to internalize achievements, fearing that success will bring higher expectations or an increased workload. This can result in a paradoxical situation where failure is accepted more readily than success, creating a reinforcing cycle of self-doubt.⁹

These six traits, while commonly observed in individuals with IS, are not exhaustive. The presence or absence of any single feature does not determine whether someone is affected by IS, as the condition manifests uniquely across individuals.

MANIFESTATIONS AND IMPACT

IS can manifest in numerous ways, including self-uncertainty, phobia of evaluation, and a persistent sense of fraudulence.¹⁰ These feelings of inadequacy can have profound effects on individuals' mental health, career advancement, and overall well-being.¹¹ Research suggests that IS may be associated with heightened levels of stress, anxiety, and burnout, ultimately impairing performance and job satisfaction.¹² Moreover, imposter feelings may hinder individuals' ability to seek support or constructive feedback, further perpetuating a cycle of self-doubt and isolation.¹³

IS is often associated with maladaptive thought patterns, such as perfectionism, excessive self-criticism, and the inability to internalize success. Individuals experiencing imposter feelings may credit their accomplishments to good luck or other external factors rather than acknowledging own abilities and efforts.¹⁴ Moreover, IS is closely associated to feelings of inadequacy and fear of failure, leading individuals to engage in self-sabotaging behaviours or to avoid challenging opportunities altogether.¹⁵ Understanding these psychological mechanisms is essential for developing effective strategies to address IS.

IS IN MEDICAL STUDENTS AND NURSING STUDENTS

Research indicates that IS is highly prevalent among medical students, with estimates ranging from 22% to 60% depending on the measurement tools and student demographics.¹² The intense academic environment, constant evaluations, and the high standards set by medical schools may exacerbate these feelings.¹⁶ Medical students are often placed under high expectations from faculty, peers, and themselves. This creates a sense of pressure to meet the perceived ideal of a “perfect” medical student. A combination of personal perfectionism, fear of failure, and social comparison with peers often contributes to feelings of inadequacy.¹⁷ Additionally, the transition from preclinical to clinical years, where students are suddenly expected to apply knowledge in real-life scenarios, may intensify IS.

Several studies in India have examined the occurrence of IS among medical students, revealing significant findings. For instance, a study done at Muzaffarnagar medical college, Uttar Pradesh, highlighted that 39% of medical students exhibited severe IS, with a slight male predominance. Additionally, the study concluded that there is a strong correlation between imposter tendencies and depression, particularly affecting female students.¹⁸

Another study conducted at Goa medical college focused on medical interns and revealed similar trends, where many students reported feelings of inadequacy despite high achievements. This study emphasized the need for interventions aimed at boosting self-esteem and reducing the impact of IS, which can negatively affect both mental health and future professional performance.¹⁹ These findings suggest that IS is prevalent among medical students in India and is associated with mental health challenges like depression and anxiety.²⁰ Medical students with IS may struggle with lower self-confidence, which can further hinder their academic performance and overall well-being.

Addressing IS in medical students requires interventions both at the personal and institutional level. Cognitive-behavioural techniques such as reframing negative thoughts and recognizing personal accomplishments have been found effective in reducing imposter feelings.²¹

Nursing students frequently face significant stress as a result of the intense academic and clinical requirements of their education, which contributes to the development of IS. A study by Gardner et al found that nursing students often report feelings of inadequacy, even when they are excelling in their coursework and clinical practice.²²

Nursing education involves both theoretical and practical components, requiring students to apply classroom knowledge in real-world clinical settings. The pressure to perform in front of peers and healthcare professionals can exacerbate feelings of self-doubt. Many nursing students also struggle with perfectionism and fear of failure, both of which are known to increase vulnerability to IS.¹⁰ Additionally, frequent assessments and evaluations can heighten the fear of being "found out" as inadequate.

IS in nursing students is often linked to mental health challenges such as anxiety, depression, and burnout. Students experiencing IS are more likely to suffer from low self-esteem and may struggle with their academic performance despite being competent. This can create a vicious cycle where their belief in their own inadequacy negatively impacts their performance, which further reinforces their imposter feelings.²³

Nursing students often experience intense feelings of inadequacy despite their accomplishments, which can lead to stress, anxiety, and burnout. A scoping review of global research indicates that nursing students, especially those in their final year or in clinical nurse specialist programs, are at heightened risk of impostor syndrome. The phenomenon negatively impacts their self-esteem and mental health, which can also affect the quality of patient care they provide.

Indian research on impostor syndrome among nursing students is still emerging. However, the prevalence and impact of impostor syndrome have been studied in related fields such as medicine and nursing in other countries. For example, studies show that factors like high academic pressure, the clinical environment, and a fear of failure contribute to feelings of fraudulence among healthcare students, including nursing students.

COPING STRATEGIES AND INTERVENTIONS

Addressing IS requires a multifaceted approach that combines individual coping strategies with systemic changes in educational and organizational settings.¹⁰ Cognitive-behavioural techniques, such as cognitive restructuring and self-affirmation, can help individuals challenge negative thought patterns and build resilience against imposter feelings.² Additionally, creating supportive environments that foster mentorship, feedback, and open dialogue can empower individuals to confront IS and cultivate a sense of belonging and validation.¹³

CONCLUSION

IS is a complex and pervasive phenomenon that can have profound effects on individuals' psychological well-being and professional development. By understanding the psychological underpinnings, manifestations, and impact of IS, individuals, educators, and mental health professionals can work towards creating inclusive environments and implementing effective interventions to support those struggling with imposter feelings. Through continued research and awareness, we can strive to mitigate the negative consequences of IS and promote a culture of authenticity, self-compassion, and resilience.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: Not required

REFERENCES

1. 1. Clance PR, Imes SA. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy. 1978;15(3):241-7.
2. 2. Sakulku J, Alexander J. The impostor phenomenon. Int J Behav Sci. 2011;6(1):73-92.
3. 3. Bravata DM, Watts SA, Keefer AL, Madhusudhan DK, Taylor KT, Clark DM, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1252-75.
4. 4. Mak KKL, Kleitman S, Abbott MJ. Impostor phenomenon measurement scales: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:671.
5. 5. Jaremka LM, Ackerman JM, Gawronski B, Rule NO, Sweeny K, Tropp LR, et al. Common academic experiences no one talks about: repeated rejection, impostor syndrome, and burnout. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15(3):519-43.
6. 6. Thomas M, Bigatti S. Perfectionism, impostor phenomenon, and mental health in medicine: a literature review. Int J Med Educ. 2020;11:201-13.
7. 7. Sukhera J, Poleksic J, Zaheer J, Pack R. Normalising disclosure or reinforcing heroism? An exploratory critical discourse analysis of mental health stigma in medical education. Med Educ. 2022;56(8):823-33.
8. 8. Giel LIS, Noordzij G, Noordegraaf-Eelens L, Denktaş S. Fear of failure: a polynomial regression analysis of the joint impact of the perceived learning environment and personal achievement goal orientation. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2020;33(2):123-39.
9. 9. Cavenar JO, Werman DS. Origins of the fear of success. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138(1):95-8.
10. 10. Bravata DM, Watts SA, Keefer AL, Madhusudhan DK, Taylor KT, Clark DM, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of imposter syndrome: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1252-75.
11. 11. Cokley K, Smith L, Bernard D, Hurst A, Jackson S, Stone S, et al. Impostor feelings as a moderator and mediator of the relationship between perceived discrimination and mental health among racial/ethnic minority college students. J Couns Psychol. 2015;62(2):242-52.
12. 12. Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM. Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: a pilot study. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:364-9.
13. 13. Bernard NS, Dollinger SJ, Ramaniah NV. Applying the big five personality factors to the impostor phenomenon. J Pers Assess. 2002;78(2):321-33.
14. 14. Langford J, Clance PR. The impostor phenomenon: recent research findings regarding dynamics, personality and family patterns and their implications for treatment. Psychotherapy. 1993;30(3):495-501.
15. 15. Hutchins HM, Rainbolt H. What triggers imposter phenomenon among academic faculty? A critical incident study exploring antecedents, coping, and development opportunities. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2018;21(4):316-37.
16. 16. Henning K, Ey S, Shaw D. Perfectionism, the impostor phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Med Educ. 1998;32(5):456-64.
17. 17. Oriel KA, Plane MB, Mundt MH. Family medicine residents and the impostor phenomenon. Fam Med. 2004;36(4):248-52.
18. 18. Verma V, Singh N. Prevalence of impostor phenomenon and its association with depression among MBBS students of Muzaffarnagar Medical College at Uttar Pradesh state of India. Indian J Behav Sci. 2022;25(01):21-4.
19. 19. Mascarenhas VR, D’Souza D, Bicholkar A. Prevalence of impostor phenomenon and its association with self-esteem among medical interns in Goa, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;6(1):355-9.
20. 20. Ewing KM, Richardson TQ, James-Myers L, Russell RK. The role of race and racial identity in impostor feelings among African American college students. J Couns Psychol. 1999;43(4):465-9.
21. 21. Kumar S, Jagacinski CM. Imposters have goals too: the imposter phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal theory. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(1):147-57.
22. 22. Gardner SK, Pyke J, Belcher M, Steele M. The imposter phenomenon in nursing students: implications for nursing education. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2021;11(3):12-8.
23. 23. Asbill S. Impostor phenomenon in nursing students: identifying interventions to decrease feelings of inadequacy. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020;41(2):91-6.