Original Research ArticleInternational Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publication: Comparing WHO C-Model generated C-Section probabilities to actual delivery outcomes in a tertiary care centre
Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(1):229-233.DOI10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175851
Abstract
Background A model which takes into account several relevant factors and gives the probability of C-Section in a woman would have the advantage of preparing for such an event. The identification of women at high risk of C-Section (>50% risk) would provide the opportunity for understanding risks involved in pursuing a vaginal delivery whereas if the risk of C-Section was less ( 50% probability, giving the model a sensitivity of 14.33%, specificity of 98.8%, positive predictive value of 90% and negative predictive value of 60.56%. Robson’s Groups 5 and 3 demonstrated the greatest overuse of C-Sections.
Conclusions The WHO Model when applied to this centre showed a high positive predictive value for C-Sections but the negative predictive value or the ability to correctly predict a vaginal delivery was much less.
Keywords
Affiliations
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, Wayanad, Kerala, India
- Department of Community Medicine, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, Wayanad, Kerala, India
- Department of Psychiatry, St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
