Original Research ArticleInternational Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology

Publication:
Comparing WHO C-Model generated C-Section probabilities to actual delivery outcomes in a tertiary care centre

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(1):229-233.DOI10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175851

Thumbnail Image
View on the journal's website(opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Background A model which takes into account several relevant factors and gives the probability of C-Section in a woman would have the advantage of preparing for such an event. The identification of women at high risk of C-Section (>50% risk) would provide the opportunity for understanding risks involved in pursuing a vaginal delivery whereas if the risk of C-Section was less ( 50% probability, giving the model a sensitivity of 14.33%, specificity of 98.8%, positive predictive value of 90% and negative predictive value of 60.56%. Robson’s Groups 5 and 3 demonstrated the greatest overuse of C-Sections.

Conclusions The WHO Model when applied to this centre showed a high positive predictive value for C-Sections but the negative predictive value or the ability to correctly predict a vaginal delivery was much less.

Keywords

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, Wayanad, Kerala, India
  2. Department of Community Medicine, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, Wayanad, Kerala, India
  3. Department of Psychiatry, St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Full item record